Cited by 195Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityReproductive tract infections researchOcular Infections and Treatments

Fluconazole-Resistant Candida albicans Vulvovaginitis

Marchaim, Dror, Lemanek, Leslie, Bheemreddy, Suchitha, Kaye, Keith S., Sobel, Jack D.·2012·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As a result of high recurrence rates of Candida albicans vaginitis, successful suppressive fluconazole is widely used, and drug resistance is considered rare. We report increased occurrence of secondary fluconazole resistance, analysis of risk factors thereof, and describe management of fluconazole-refractory vaginitis. METHODS: Patients referred to the Vaginitis Clinic at Wayne State University with clinically refractory fluconazole-resistant (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] 2 micrograms/mL or greater) C albicans vaginitis from 2000 to 2010 were enrolled. Patients completed a questionnaire pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, behavioral characteristics, exposure to antimicrobials and antifungals, fluconazole consumption in defined daily doses in the previous 6 months, management received, and outcomes. With patients not located, data were extracted from charts. Susceptibilities to antifungals were determined by broth microdilution. RESULTS: Twenty-five women with fluconazole-resistant recurrent C albicans vaginitis were identified, and 16 returned filled questionnaires. Study cohort consisted mainly of married, insured white women with more than 12 years of formal education and average or above average socioeconomic status. Median fluconazole MIC was 8 micrograms/mL (range 2-128 micrograms/mL). Risk factors for mycologic failure included increased fluconazole consumption (P=.03) with 16 of 25 women exposed to low-dose weekly fluconazole maintenance therapy. All patients were clinically controlled successfully, although treatment was difficult and often prolonged. CONCLUSION: Fluconazole-resistant C albicans vaginitis was previously considered rare. We report 25 cases over an 11-year period, indicating an emerging problem. All patients had fluconazole consumption in the previous 6 months. Management of fluconazole refractory disease is extremely difficult with limited options, and new therapeutic modalities are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827307b2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marchaim, D., Lemanek, L., Bheemreddy, S., Kaye, K. S., & Sobel, J. D.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2012-12
Volume
120
Issue
6
Pages
1407-1414
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2185069069
Cited by
195
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
fluconazole resistance, Candida albicans, vulvovaginitis, recurrent vaginitis, risk factors, antifungal susceptibility, treatment failure
MeSH terms
Adult, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Female, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Fluconazole, Incidence, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review