Cited by 78Reproductive Health and ContraceptionBone health and osteoporosis researchMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Use of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Contraception and Incidence of Bone Fracture

Lanza, Lee L., McQuay, Lisa J., Rothman, Kenneth J., Bone, Henry G., Kaunitz, Andrew M., Harel, Zeev, Ataher, Quazi, Ross, Douglas +2 more·2013·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) reversibly reduces bone mineral density. To estimate the extent to which DMPA might increase fracture risk, we undertook a retrospective cohort study of fractures in DMPA users and users of non-DMPA contraceptives, using the General Practice Research Database. METHODS: Eligible women were aged younger than 50 years at the qualifying first contraceptive prescription. The DMPA users were classified by DMPA exposure (cumulative and time of last dose) based on prescription records. All incident fractures were included; fracture incidence and risk factors before starting contraceptive use (DMPA or other) also were estimated. RESULTS: We identified 11,822 fractures in 312,395 women during 1,722,356 person-years of follow-up. Before contraceptive use started, DMPA users had higher fracture risk than nonusers (incidence rate ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.53). After DMPA started, crude fracture incidence was 9.1 per 1,000 person-years for DMPA users and 7.3 for nonusers (crude incidence rate ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.16-1.30). Fracture risk in DMPA users did not increase after starting DMPA (incidence rate ratio after or before 1.08, 95% CI 0.92-1.26). There was little confounding by age or other factors that could be measured. Fracture incidence was 9.4 per 1,000 person-years in low-exposure DMPA users, and 7.8 per 1,000 in high-exposure DMPA users. The DMPA users had higher fracture risk than nonusers at the start of contraceptive use, with no discernible induction period. CONCLUSION: Although DMPA users experienced more fractures than nonusers, this association may be the result of confounding by a pre-existing higher risk for fractures in women who chose DMPA for contraception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e318283d1a1

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanza, L. L., McQuay, L. J., Rothman, K. J., Bone, H. G., Kaunitz, A. M., Harel, Z., Ataher, Q., Ross, D., Arena, P. L., & Wolter, K. D.
Affiliations
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2013-03
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
593-600
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017598716
Cited by
78
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, fracture risk, bone mineral density, hormonal contraception, osteoporosis, confounding by indication, fracture incidence, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Contraceptive Agents, Female, Delayed-Action Preparations, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Fractures, Bone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review