Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a Comorbidity Index for Use in Obstetric Patients

Open access
Bateman, Brian T., Mhyre, Jill M., Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia, Huybrechts, Krista F., Fischer, Michael A., Creanga, Andreea A., Callaghan, William M., Gagne, Joshua J.·2013·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a maternal comorbidity index to predict severe maternal morbidity, defined as the occurrence of acute maternal end-organ injury, or mortality. METHODS: Data were derived from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract for the years 2000-2007. The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of maternal end-organ injury or death during the delivery hospitalization through 30 days postpartum. The data set was randomly divided into a two-thirds development cohort and a one-third validation cohort. Using the development cohort, a logistic regression model predicting the primary outcome was created using a stepwise selection algorithm that included 24-candidate comorbid conditions and maternal age. Each of the conditions included in the final model was assigned a weight based on its beta coefficient, and these were used to calculate a maternal comorbidity index. RESULTS: The cohort included 854,823 completed pregnancies, of which 9,901 (1.2%) were complicated by the primary study outcome. The derived score included 20 maternal conditions and maternal age. For each point increase in the score, the odds ratio for the primary outcome was 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.39). The c-statistic for this model was 0.657 (95% CI 0.647-0.666). The derived score performed significantly better than available comorbidity indices in predicting maternal morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: This new maternal comorbidity index provides a simple measure for summarizing the burden of maternal illness for use in the conduct of epidemiologic, health services, and comparative effectiveness research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a603bb

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Bateman, B. T., Mhyre, J. M., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Huybrechts, K. F., Fischer, M. A., Creanga, A. A., Callaghan, W. M., & Gagne, J. J.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2013-11
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
957-965
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005569714
Cited by
490
References
5
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Comorbidity Index for Use in Obstetric Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a603bb
The paper
Bateman, B. T., Mhyre, J. M., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Huybrechts, K. F., Fischer, M. A., Creanga, A. A., Callaghan, W. M., & Gagne, J. J. (2013). Development of a Comorbidity Index for Use in Obstetric Patients. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a603bb

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.