CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 792Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus

Meikle, Mary B., Henry, James A., Griest, Susan E., Stewart, Barbara J., Abrams, Harvey B., McArdle, Rachel, Myers, Paula J., Newman, Craig W., Sandridge, Sharon, Turk, Dennis C., Folmer, Robert L., Frederick, Eric J., House, John W., Jacobson, Gary P., Kinney, Sam E., Martin, William H., Nagler, Stephen M., Reich, Gloria E., Searchfield, Grant, Sweetow, Robert, Vernon, Jack A.·2012·Ear & Hearing
DOI 10.1097/aud.0b013e31822f67c0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives Chronic subjective tinnitus is a prevalent condition that causes significant distress to millions of Americans. Effective tinnitus treatments are urgently needed, but evaluating them is hampered by the lack of standardized measures that are validated for both intake assessment and evaluation of treatment outcomes. This work was designed to develop a new self-report questionnaire, the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), that would have documented validity both for scaling the severity and negative impact of tinnitus for use in intake assessment and for measuring treatment-related changes in tinnitus (responsiveness) and that would provide comprehensive coverage of multiple tinnitus severity domains. Design To use preexisting knowledge concerning tinnitus-related problems, an Item Selection Panel (17 expert judges) surveyed the content (175 items) of nine widely used tinnitus questionnaires. From those items, the Panel identified 13 separate domains of tinnitus distress and selected 70 items most likely to be responsive to treatment effects. Eliminating redundant items while retaining good content validity and adding new items to achieve the recommended minimum of 3 to 4 items per domain yielded 43 items, which were then used for constructing TFI Prototype 1.Prototype 1 was tested at five clinics. The 326 participants included consecutive patients receiving tinnitus treatment who provided informed consent-constituting a convenience sample. Construct validity of Prototyp…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aud.0b013e31822f67c0

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Newman, 1998, W., Sandridge S. A., Jacobson G. P.. Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome., J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 153
  2. Sweetow, 1990, W., Levy M. C. Tinnitus severity scaling for diagnostictherapeutic usage., Hear Instrum, 41, 44

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 792

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Meikle, M. B., Henry, J. A., Griest, S. E., Stewart, B. J., Abrams, H. B., McArdle, R., Myers, P. J., Newman, C. W., Sandridge, S., Turk, D. C., Folmer, R. L., Frederick, E. J., House, J. W., Jacobson, G. P., Kinney, S. E., Martin, W. H., Nagler, S. M., Reich, G. E., Searchfield, G., Sweetow, R., & Vernon, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Bay Pines VA Healthcare System (US)
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • House Clinic (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Henry, James A.
ORCID
Venue
Ear & Hearing
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2012-03
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
153-176
ISSN
0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/aud.0b013e31822f67c0
OpenAlex
W2001993563
Cited by
792
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ear and Hearing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
Tinnitus Functional Index, chronic subjective tinnitus, tinnitus severity, tinnitus distress, self-report questionnaire development, treatment outcome assessment, responsiveness, content validity, construct validity, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, convergent and discriminant validity, factor structure, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Depression, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Medical History Taking, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Tinnitus, Reproducibility of Results, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review