Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcomes of Early- and Late-Identified Children at 3 Years of Age: Findings From a Prospective Population-Based Study

Open access
Ching, Teresa Y. C., Dillon, Harvey, Marnane, Vivienne, Hou, Sanna, Day, Julia, Seeto, Mark, Crowe, Kathryn, Street, Laura, Thomson, Jessica, Van Buynder, Patricia, Zhang, Vicky, Wong, Angela, Burns, Lauren, Flynn, Christopher, Cupples, Linda, Cowan, Robert S. C., Leigh, Greg, Sjahalam-King, Jessica, Yeh, Angel·2013·Ear & Hearing

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To address the question of whether, on a population level, early detection and amplification improve outcomes of children with hearing impairment. Design: All families of children who were born between 2002 and 2007, and who presented for hearing services below 3 years of age at Australian Hearing pediatric centers in New South Wales, Victoria, and Southern Queensland were invited to participate in a prospective study on outcomes. Children’s speech, language, functional, and social outcomes were assessed at 3 years of age, using a battery of age-appropriate tests. Demographic information relating to the child, family, and educational intervention was solicited through the use of custom-designed questionnaires. Audiological data were collected from the national database of Australian Hearing and records held at educational intervention agencies for children. Regression analysis was used to investigate the effects of each of 15 predictor variables, including age of amplification, on outcomes. Results: Four hundred and fifty-one children enrolled in the study, 56% of whom received their first hearing aid fitting before 6 months of age. On the basis of clinical records, 44 children (10%) were diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. There were 107 children (24%) reported to have additional disabilities. At 3 years of age, 317 children (70%) were hearing aid users and 134 children (30%) used cochlear implants. On the basis of parent reports, about 71% used an aural/oral mode of communication, and about 79% used English as the spoken language at home. Children’s performance scores on standardized tests administered at 3 years of age were used in a factor analysis to derive a global development factor score. On average, the global score of hearing-impaired children was more than 1 SD below the mean of normal-hearing children at the same age. Regression analysis revealed that five factors, including female gender, absence of additional disabilities, less severe hearing loss, higher maternal education, and (for children with cochlear implants) earlier age of switch-on were associated with better outcomes at the 5% significance level. Whereas the effect of age of hearing aid fitting on child outcomes was weak, a younger age at cochlear implant switch-on was significantly associated with better outcomes for children with cochlear implants at 3 years of age. Conclusions: Fifty-six percent of the 451 children were fitted with hearing aids before 6 months of age. At 3 years of age, 134 children used cochlear implants and the remaining children used hearing aids. On average, outcomes were well below population norms. Significant predictors of child outcomes include: presence/absence of additional disabilities, severity of hearing loss, gender, maternal education, together with age of switch-on for children with cochlear implants. A prospective, population–based study examined the developmental outcomes of 451 children, of whom 56% first received amplification before 6 months of age. Outcomes were measured through direct administration of standardized assessments of speech and language to children, and collection of written reports from children’s parents/ caregivers and teachers. On average, children with hearing loss performed 1 SD below their normal-hearing peers. Sex, presence/absence of additional disabilities, degree of hearing loss, maternal education, and age of switch–on (for the 134 children with cochlear implants) were important factors in predicting outcomes of children at 3 years of age.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aud.0b013e3182857718

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Ching, T. Y. C., Dillon, H., Marnane, V., Hou, S., Day, J., Seeto, M., Crowe, K., Street, L., Thomson, J., Van Buynder, P., Zhang, V., Wong, A., Burns, L., Flynn, C., Cupples, L., Cowan, R. S. C., Leigh, G., Sjahalam-King, J., & Yeh, A.
Venue
Ear & Hearing
Published
2013-09
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
535-552
ISSN
0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006433940
Cited by
290
References
46
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes of Early- and Late-Identified Children at 3 Years of Age: Findings From a Prospective Population-Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aud.0b013e3182857718
The paper
Ching, T. Y. C., Dillon, H., Marnane, V., Hou, S., Day, J., Seeto, M., Crowe, K., Street, L., Thomson, J., Van Buynder, P., Zhang, V., Wong, A., Burns, L., Flynn, C., Cupples, L., Cowan, R. S. C., Leigh, G., Sjahalam-King, J., & Yeh, A. (2013). Outcomes of Early- and Late-Identified Children at 3 Years of Age: Findings From a Prospective Population-Based Study. Ear & Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0b013e3182857718

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.