Cited by 75Burn Injury Management and OutcomesWound Healing and TreatmentsDermatologic Treatments and Research

Progression of wound pH during the course of healing in burns

Sharpe, Justin R., Booth, Simon, Jubin, Kasia, Jordan, Nigel R., Lawrence-Watt, Diana J., Dheansa, Baljit S.·2013·Journal of Burn Care & Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to measure the pH on the wound surface of 30 burn patients and test the hypothesis that wound surface pH is correlated to healing time and burn depth. Inclusion criteria were any adult outpatient with burn injury. Patient age was 17 to 75 years (mean, 44), burn depth ranged from superficial to full thickness with a TBSA of 0.4 to 4%. Cause of burn included scalds, flame burn, and contact burns. On admission, and at each dressing change, the pH on the wound surface was measured. The pH in both healing and nonhealing wounds was found to decrease with each dressing change. At the second dressing change, wounds that went on to heal were found to have a significantly lower pH of 7.32 in comparison with pH 7.73 in wounds that failed to heal and therefore required subsequent grafting (P = .004). Wound pH was also correlated to depth at the second dressing change (superficial = pH 6.05, full thickness = pH 8.0). The correlation between pH and wound outcome could be used as an additional diagnostic tool to predict poor healing in wounds. Early identification of a nonhealing wound may allow a more aggressive treatment regimen, including skin grafting, to bring about rapid wound healing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/bcr.0b013e31825d5569

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharpe, J. R., Booth, S., Jubin, K., Jordan, N. R., Lawrence-Watt, D. J., & Dheansa, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Queen Victoria Hospital (GB)
  • Blond McIndoe Research Foundation (GB)
Corresponding author
Sharpe, Justin R.
Venue
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2013
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
e201-e208
ISSN
1559-047X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065859125
Cited by
74
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Burn Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rosetrees Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
wound healing, burn depth, chronic wounds, skin grafting, dressing changes, burns
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bandages, Burns, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Wound Healing, Injury Severity Score, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review