Cited by 22Surgical Simulation and TrainingSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical Education

Technical and Nontechnical Skills in Surgery: A Simulated Operating Room Environment Study

Pfandler, Michael, Stefan, Philipp, Mehren, Christoph, Lazarovici, Marc, Weigl, Matthias·2019·Spine

Abstract

Study design Observational simulation study. Objective The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between technical and nontechnical skills (NTS) in a simulated surgical procedure. Summary of background data Although surgeons' technical and NTS during surgery are crucial determinants for clinical outcomes, little literature is available in spine surgery. Moreover, evidence regarding how surgeons' technical and NTS are related is limited. Methods A mixed-reality and full-scale simulated operating room environment was employed for the surgical team. Eleven surgeons performed the vertebroplasty procedure (VP). Technical skills (TS) were assessed using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill scores and senior expert-evaluated VP outcome assessment. NTS were assessed with the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery. Kendall-Tau-b tests were performed for correlations. We further controlled the influence of surgeons' experience (based on professional tenure and number of previous VPs performed). Result Surgeons' NTS correlated significantly with their technical performance (τ = 0.63; P = 0.006) and surgical outcome scores (τ = 0.60; P = 0.007). This association was attenuated when controlling for surgeons' experience. Conclusion Our results suggest that spine surgeons with higher levels of TS also apply better communication, leadership, and coordination behaviors during the procedure. Yet, the role of surgeons' experience needs further investigation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0000000000003154

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outcomes after minimally invasive surgery are positively correlated with technical proficiency, experience, and procedural volume of the operator.

    “It is well known that due to the aforementioned challenges, among others, outcomes after minimally invasive surgery are positively correlated with technical proficiency, experience, and procedural volume of the operator (Birkmeyer et al., 2013; Pfandler et al., 2019; Hafezi-Nejad et al., 2020; Foley and Hsu, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfandler, M., Stefan, P., Mehren, C., Lazarovici, M., & Weigl, M.
Affiliations
  • ORCID (US)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
  • Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (DE)
Corresponding author
Pfandler, Michael
Venue
Spine
Published
2019-12-01
Volume
44
Issue
23
Pages
E1396-E1400
ISSN
  • 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1159
OpenAlex
W2964853206
Cited by
22
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
non-technical skills, technical skills, spinal surgery, vertebroplasty, surgical simulation, teamwork, leadership, communication, surgical outcomes, surgeon experience, mixed reality simulation
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Communication, Humans, Leadership, Operating Rooms, Patient Care Team, Pilot Projects, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review