Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology of Adolescent Spinal Pain: A Systematic Overview of the Research Literature

Jeffries, Leah J., Milanese, Steve F., Grimmer-Somers, Karen A.·2007·Spine

Abstract

In Brief Study Design. Systematic literature review. Objective. To explore the available research literature, and provide an up-to-date synthesis of the epidemiology of idiopathic adolescent spinal pain (IASP). Summary of Background Data. IASP and its potential causes have been a concern to researchers for over 2 decades. Because it has been suggested that IASP is related to the incidence of adult spinal pain, it appears important to synthesize what is currently known about IASP. Method. A systematic meta-synthesis approach was used to identify secondary review articles and primary epidemiological studies regarding any type of IASP (neck, upper back, or low back). Results. A total of 56 primary epidemiological (cross-sectional or longitudinal) studies were identified. Spinal or back pain was the most commonly reported measure, with the lifetime prevalence figures ranging from 4.7% to 74.4%. The lifetime prevalence of low back pain had a similar range, 7% to 72%. The prevalence of pain in other areas of the spine (i.e., thoracic spine and neck) was variably reported, as were incidence rates for all areas of the adolescent spine. IASP is thus a significant problem, and the prevalence figures approach those of adults. There is some evidence that IASP is a risk factor for spinal pain in adulthood. However, there was considerable variation in how back pain was defined, the areas of the spine that were reported on, the manner in which data were collected and reported, thus preventing any significant comparisons of prevalence or incidence rates across studies. Conclusion. Although there is wide discrepancy in the manner in which adolescent spinal pain is reported, it is evident that lifetime prevalence rates increase steadily with age and approximate adult levels by around the age of 18 years. There is an opportunity for further longitudinal research, with standardized methodology, to be undertaken that builds on the findings from this large group of studies. This systematic review of the literature revealed that idiopathic adolescent spinal pain is a significant problem, and that prevalence figures approach those of adults by the end of adolescence. Longitudinal research also indicates that idiopathic adolescent spinal pain may be a risk factor for spinal pain in adulthood. There is considerable scope to standardize idiopathic adolescent spinal pain epidemiological research to facilitate international comparison, and to increase the applicability of results across different populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0b013e318158d70b

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Jeffries, L. J., Milanese, S. F., & Grimmer-Somers, K. A.
Venue
Spine
Published
2007-11
Volume
32
Issue
23
Pages
2630-2637
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075857511
Cited by
400
References
47
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Adolescent Spinal Pain: A Systematic Overview of the Research Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/brs.0b013e318158d70b
The paper
Jeffries, L. J., Milanese, S. F., & Grimmer-Somers, K. A. (2007). Epidemiology of Adolescent Spinal Pain: A Systematic Overview of the Research Literature. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318158d70b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.