Cited by 1,067Sports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and HealthPhysical Education and Training Studies

Youth Resistance Training: Updated Position Statement Paper From the National Strength and Conditioning Association

Faigenbaum, Avery D, Kraemer, William J, Blimkie, Cameron J R, Jeffreys, Ian, Micheli, Lyle J, Nitka, Mike, Rowland, Thomas W·2009·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

Faigenbaum, AD, Kraemer, WJ, Blimkie, CJR, Jeffreys, I, Micheli, LJ, Nitka, M, and Rowland, TW. Youth resistance training: Updated position statement paper from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res 23(5): S60-S79, 2009-Current recommendations suggest that school-aged youth should participate daily in 60 minutes or more of moderate to vigorous physical activity that is developmentally appropriate and enjoyable and involves a variety of activities (219). Not only is regular physical activity essential for normal growth and development, but also a physically active lifestyle during the pediatric years may help to reduce the risk of developing some chronic diseases later in life (196). In addition to aerobic activities such as swimming and bicycling, research increasingly indicates that resistance training can offer unique benefits for children and adolescents when appropriately prescribed and supervised (28,66,111,139,147,234). The qualified acceptance of youth resistance training by medical, fitness, and sport organizations is becoming universal (5,6,8,12,18,33,104,167,192,215). Nowadays, comprehensive school-based programs are specifically designed to enhance health-related components of physical fitness, which include muscular strength (169). In addition, the health club and sport conditioning industry is getting more involved in the youth fitness market. In the U.S.A., the number of health club members between the ages of 6 and 17 years continues to increase (127,252) and a growing number of private sport conditioning centers now cater to young athletes. Thus, as more children and adolescents resistance train in schools, health clubs, and sport training centers, it is imperative to determine safe, effective, and enjoyable practices by which resistance training can improve the health, fitness, and sports performance of younger populations. The National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) recognizes and supports the premise that many of the benefits associated with adult resistance training programs are attainable by children and adolescents who follow age-specific resistance training guidelines. The NSCA published the first position statement paper on youth resistance training in 1985 (170) and revised this statement in 1996 (72). The purpose of the present report is to update and clarify the 1996 recommendations on 4 major areas of importance. These topics include (a) the potential risks and concerns associated with youth resistance training, (b) the potential health and fitness benefits of youth resistance training, (c) the types and amount of resistance training needed by healthy children and adolescents, and (d) program design considerations for optimizing long-term training adaptations. The NSCA based this position statement paper on a comprehensive analysis of the pertinent scientific evidence regarding the anatomical, physiological, and psychosocial effects of youth resistance training. An expert panel of exercise scientists, physicians, and health/physical education teachers with clinical, practical, and research expertise regarding issues related to pediatric exercise science, sports medicine, and resistance training contributed to this statement. The NSCA Research Committee reviewed this report before the formal endorsement by the NSCA. For the purpose of this article, the term children refers to boys and girls who have not yet developed secondary sex characteristics (approximately up to the age of 11 years in girls and 13 years in boys; Tanner stages 1 and 2 of sexual maturation). This period of development is referred to as preadolescence. The term adolescence refers to a period between childhood and adulthood and includes girls aged 12-18 years and boys aged 14-18 years (Tanner stages 3 and 4 of sexual maturation). The terms youth and young athletes are broadly defined in this report to include both children and adolescents. By definition, the term resistance training refers to a specialized method of conditioning, which involves the progressive use of a wide range of resistive loads and a variety of training modalities designed to enhance health, fitness, and sports performance. Although the term resistance training, strength training, and weight training are sometimes used synonymously, the term resistance training encompasses a broader range of training modalities and a wider variety of training goals. The term weightlifting refers to a competitive sport that involves the performance of the snatch and clean and jerk lifts. This article builds on previous recommendations from the NSCA and should serve as the prevailing statement regarding youth resistance training. It is the current position of the NSCA that: A properly designed and supervised resistance training program is relatively safe for youth. A properly designed and supervised resistance training program can enhance the muscular strength and power of youth. A properly designed and supervised

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31819df407

Cites

229 of 229 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 1981, Blanksby, B and Gregor, J. Anthropometric, strength, and physiological changes in male and female swimmers with progressive resistance training., Aust J Sport Sci, 1, 3
  2. 1989, Blimkie, C, Martin, J, Ramsay, D, Sale, D, and MacDougall, D. The effects of detraining and maintenance weight training on strength development in prepubertal boys., Can J Sport Sci, 14, 104
  3. 1990, Bulgakova, N, Vorontsov, A, and Fomichenko, T. Improving the technical preparedness of young swimmers by using strength training., Sov Sports Rev, 25, 102
  4. 1987, Docherty, D, Wenger, H, Collis, M, and Quinney, H. The effects of variable speed resistance training on strength development in prepubertal boys., J Hum Mov Stud, 13, 377
  5. 2007, Faigenbaum, A, McFarland, J, Johnson, L, Kang, J, Bloom, J, Ratamess, N, and Hoffman, J. Preliminary evaluation of an after-school resistance training program., Percept Mot Skills, 104, 407
  6. 2003, Faigenbaum, A, Milliken, L, and Westcott, W. Maximal strength testing in children., J Strength Cond Res, 17, 162
  7. 2007, Faigenbaum, A and Westcott, W. Resistance training for obese children and adolescents., Presidents Council on Physical Fitness and Sport Res Digest, 8, 1
  8. 1996, Faigenbaum, A, Westcott, W, Micheli, L, Outerbridge, A, Long, C, LaRosa-Loud, R, and Zaichkowsky, L. The effects of strength training and detraining on children., J Strength Cond Res, 10, 109
  9. 2005, Hewett, T, Myer, G, and Ford, K. Reducing knee and anterior cruciate ligament injuries among female athletes., J Knee Surg, 18, 82
  10. 2003, Kravitz, L, Akalan, C, Nowicki, K, and Kinzey, S. Prediction of 1 repetition maximum in high school power lifters., J Strength Cond Res, 17, 167
  11. 2000, Micheli, L, Glassman, R, and Klein, M. The prevention of sports injuries in youth., Clin Sports Med, 19, 821
  12. 2008, Mountjoy, M, Armstrong, N, Bizzini, L, Blimkie, C, Evans, J, Gerrard, D, Hangen, J, Knoll, K, Micheli, L, Sangenis, P, and Van Mechelen, W. IOC Consensus Statement: Training the elite young athlete., Clin J Sport Med, 18, 122
  13. 1985, Position paper on prepubescent strength training., Nat Strength Cond Assoc J, 7, 27
  14. 1999, Pierce, K, Byrd, R, and Stone, M. Youth weightlifting-Is it safe?, Weightlifting USA, 17, 5
  15. 1990, Risser, W, Risser, J, and Preston, D. Weight-training injuries in adolescents., Am J Dis Child, 144, 1015
  16. Westcott, 1979, Female response to weight lifting., J Phys Educ, 77, 31
  17. Westcott, 1992, A new look at youth fitness., Am Fitness Q, 11, 16

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faigenbaum, A. D., Kraemer, W. J., Blimkie, C. J. R., Jeffreys, I., Micheli, L. J., Nitka, M., & Rowland, T. W.
Affiliations
  • The College of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Glamorgan (GB)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Baystate Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Faigenbaum, Avery D
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2009-08
Volume
23
Issue
Supplement 5
Pages
S60-S79
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968867688
Cited by
1,067
References
229
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 51
FWCI
41.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
children and adolescents, injury risk, training guidelines, muscle strength, physical fitness, athletic performance, school programs, injury prevention, growth and development, chronic disease prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Athletic Injuries, Child, Child Welfare, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Education and Training, Physical Fitness, United States, Weight Lifting, Guidelines as Topic, Muscle, Skeletal, Risk Assessment, Muscle Strength, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review