Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 867

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and Pattern of Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes in a Population Study of One Thousand Forty-Three Individuals

Cheung, Kenneth M. C., Karppinen, Jaro, Chan, Danny, Ho, Daniel W. H., Song, You-Qiang, Sham, Pak, Cheah, Kathryn S. E., Leong, John C. Y., Luk, Keith D. K.·2009·Spine

Abstract

In Brief Study Design. A cross-sectional population study of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes. Objective. To examine the pattern and prevalence of lumbar spine MRI changes within a southern Chinese population and their relationship with back pain. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies on MRI changes and back pain have used populations of asymptomatic individuals or patients presenting with back pain and sciatica. Thus, the prevalence and pattern of intervertebral disc degeneration within the population is not known. Methods. Lumbar spine MRIs were obtained in 1043 volunteers between 18 to 55 years of age. MRI changes including disc degeneration, herniation, anular tears (HIZ), and Schmorl’s nodes were noted by 2 independent observers. Differences were settled by consensus. Disc degeneration was graded using Schneiderman’s classification, and a total score (DDD score) was calculated by the summation of the Schneiderman’s score for each lumbar level. A K-mean clustering program was used to group individuals into different patterns of degeneration. Results. Forty percent of individuals under 30 years of age had lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD), the prevalence of LDD increasing progressively to over 90% by 50 to 55 years of age. There was a positive correlation between the DDD score and low back pain. L5–S1 and L4–L5 were the most commonly affected levels. Apart from the usual patterns of degeneration, some uncommon patternsof degeneration were identified, comprising of subjects with skip level lesions (intervening normal levels) and isolated upper or mid lumbar degeneration. Conclusion. LDD is common, and its incidence increases with age. In a population setting, there is a significant association of LDD on MRI with back pain. This large scale population study of magnetic resonance imaging changes of the lumbar spine between the ages of 18 and 55 years showed that lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration was found to be common and age dependent. Magnetic resonance imaging changes of degeneration are associated with low back pain. Some unusual patterns of degeneration were identified.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a01b3f

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 867

Metadata

Authors
Cheung, K. M. C., Karppinen, J., Chan, D., Ho, D. W. H., Song, Y.-Q., Sham, P., Cheah, K. S. E., Leong, J. C. Y., & Luk, K. D. K.
Venue
Spine
Published
2009-04
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
934-940
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090272540
Cited by
867
References
32
FWCI
15.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Pattern of Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes in a Population Study of One Thousand Forty-Three Individuals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a01b3f
The paper
Cheung, K. M. C., Karppinen, J., Chan, D., Ho, D. W. H., Song, Y.-Q., Sham, P., Cheah, K. S. E., Leong, J. C. Y., & Luk, K. D. K. (2009). Prevalence and Pattern of Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes in a Population Study of One Thousand Forty-Three Individuals. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a01b3f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.