The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association Between the Choice of IV Crystalloid and In-Hospital Mortality Among Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Isotonic saline is the most commonly used crystalloid in the ICU, but recent evidence suggests that balanced fluids like Lactated Ringer's solution may be preferable. We examined the association between choice of crystalloids and in-hospital mortality during the resuscitation of critically ill adults with sepsis. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with sepsis, not undergoing any surgical procedures, and treated in an ICU by hospital day 2. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding and compared the following outcomes after resuscitation with balanced versus with no-balanced fluids: in-hospital mortality, acute renal failure with and without dialysis, and hospital and ICU lengths of stay. We also estimated the dose-response relationship between receipt of increasing proportions of balanced fluids and in-hospital mortality. SETTING: Three hundred sixty U.S. hospitals that were members of the Premier Healthcare alliance between November 2005 and December 2010. PATIENTS: A total of 53,448 patients with sepsis, treated with vasopressors and crystalloids in an ICU by hospital day 2 including 3,396 (6.4%) that received balanced fluids. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients treated with balanced fluids were younger and less likely to have heart or chronic renal failure, but they were more likely to receive mechanical ventilation, invasive monitoring, colloids, steroids, and larger crystalloid volumes (median 7 vs 5 L). Among 6,730 patients in a propensity-matched cohort, receipt of balanced fluids was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (19.6% vs 22.8%; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78, 0.94). Mortality was progressively lower among patients receiving larger proportions of balanced fluids. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of acute renal failure (with and without dialysis) or in-hospital and ICU lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults with sepsis, resuscitation with balanced fluids was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality. If confirmed in randomized trials, this finding could have significant public health implications, as crystalloid resuscitation is nearly universal in sepsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000
Martin, G. S., Mannino, D. M., Eaton, S., & Moss, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022139 · Cited by 5,841
Chowdhury, A. H., Cox, E. F., Francis, S. T., & Lobo, D. N. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318256be72 · Cited by 764
Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007
Lagu, T., Rothberg, M. B., Shieh, M.-S., Pekow, P. S., Steingrub, J. S., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2012) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318232db65 · Cited by 679
Self-citationKellum, J. A. (2002) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200202000-00006 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults.
Semler, M. W., Self, W. H., Wanderer, J. P., Ehrenfeld, J. M., Wang, L., Byrne, D. W., Stollings, J. L., Kumar, A. B., Hughes, C. G., Hernandez, A., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1711584 · Cited by 1,433
Self-citationYoung, P., Bailey, M., Beasley, R., Henderson, S., Mackle, D., McArthur, C., McGuinness, S., Mehrtens, J., Myburgh, J., Psirides, A., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.12334 · Cited by 728
Balanced crystalloids versus saline in the intensive care unit. The SALT randomized trial.
Semler, M. W., Wanderer, J. P., Ehrenfeld, J. M., Stollings, J. L., Self, W. H., Siew, E. D., Wang, L., Byrne, D. W., Shaw, A. D., Bernard, G. R., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201607-1345oc · Cited by 249
Self-citationBalanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Sepsis. A Secondary Analysis of the SMART Clinical Trial
Brown, R. M., Wang, L., Coston, T. D., Krishnan, N. I., Casey, J. D., Wanderer, J. P., Ehrenfeld, J. M., Byrne, D. W., Stollings, J. L., Siew, E. D., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201903-0557oc · Cited by 202
The initial resuscitation of septic shock
Cinel, I., Kasapoglu, U. S., Gul, F., & Dellinger, R. P. (2020) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.02.004 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Raghunathan, K., Shaw, A., Nathanson, B., Stürmer, T., Brookhart, A., Stefan, M. S., Setoguchi, S., Beadles, C., & Lindenauer, P. K.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1585-1591
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966186276
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 36.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between the Choice of IV Crystalloid and In-Hospital Mortality Among Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0000000000000305
- The paper
- Raghunathan, K., Shaw, A., Nathanson, B., Stürmer, T., Brookhart, A., Stefan, M. S., Setoguchi, S., Beadles, C., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2014). Association Between the Choice of IV Crystalloid and In-Hospital Mortality Among Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000000305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.