Cited by 187Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersNosocomial Infections in ICU

The Association Between Nutritional Adequacy and Long-Term Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter Cohort Study*

Wei, Xuejiao, Day, Andrew G., Ouellette-Kuntz, Hélène, Heyland, Daren K.·2015·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between short-term nutritional adequacy received while in the ICU and long-term outcomes including 6-month survival and health-related quality of life in critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected in the context of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: An international sample of ICUs. PATIENTS: Adult patients who were mechanically ventilated for more than 8 days in the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nutritional adequacy was obtained from the average proportion of prescribed calories received over the amount prescribed during the first 8 days. Survival status and health-related quality of life as assessed using the Short-Form 36 v2 were obtained at 3- and 6 months post ICU admission. Of the 1,223 patients enrolled in the randomized controlled trial, 475 met the inclusion criteria for this study. At 6-month follow-up, 302 of the 475 patients (64%) were alive. Survival time in those who received low nutritional adequacy was significantly shorter than those who received high nutritional adequacy while adjusting for important covariates (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). At 3-month follow-up, a 25% increase in nutritional adequacy was associated with improvements in Physical Functioning and Role Physical of 7.3 (p = 0.02) and 8.3 (p = 0.004) points, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, adjusted increases in Physical Functioning and Role Physical scores for every 25% increase in nutrition adequacy became smaller and were no longer statistically significant (adjusted estimate for Physical Functioning = 4.2, p = 0.14; for Role Physical = 3.2, p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Greater amounts of nutritional intake received during the first week in the ICU were associated with longer survival time and faster physical recovery to 3 months but not 6 months post ICU discharge in critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Current recommendations to underfeed critically ill patients may cause harm in some long-stay patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000001000

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a systematic review of ten observational studies enrolling 3030 patients, frailty was associated with higher hospital mortality (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.43, 2.05).

    “In a recent systematic review (319) including ten observational studies enrolling a total of 3030 patients (927 frail and 2103 fit patients), frailty was associated with higher hospital mortality (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.43, 2.05; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 32%]”
  • The pooled prevalence of frailty was 30% (95% CI 29-32%).

    “The pooled prevalence of frailty was 30% (95% CI 29-32%).”
  • Frail patients were less likely to be discharged home than fit patients (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.49, 0.71).

    “Frail patients were less likely to be discharged home than fit patients (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.49, 0.71; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 12%).”
  • In the same systematic review, frailty was associated with higher long-term mortality (RR 1.53; 95% CI 1.40, 1.68).

    “and long-term mortality (RR 1.53; 95% CI 1.40, 1.68; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, X., Day, A. G., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., & Heyland, D. K.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2015-08
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
1569-1579
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987414127
Cited by
187
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2013: 1
FWCI
24.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QSpace (Queen's University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research Board
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
nutritional adequacy, critically ill patients, prolonged mechanical ventilation, intensive care nutrition, survival, health-related quality of life, physical function, underfeeding, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Quality of Life, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Body Mass Index, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, APACHE, Organ Dysfunction Scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review