Cited by 68Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAntibiotic Use and ResistanceEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Likelihood of bacterial infection in patients treated with broad-spectrum IV antibiotics in the emergency department.

Open access
Shappell, Claire N., Klompas, Michael, Ochoa, Aileen, Rhee, Chanu·2021·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Best practice guidelines and quality metrics recommend immediate antibiotic treatment for all patients with suspected sepsis. However, little is known about how many patients given IV antibiotics in the emergency department are ultimately confirmed to have bacterial infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We performed a retrospective study of adult patients who presented to four Massachusetts emergency departments between June 2015 and June 2018 with suspected serious bacterial infection, defined as blood cultures drawn and broad-spectrum IV antibiotics administered. Structured medical record reviews were performed on a random sample of 300 cases to determine the post hoc likelihood of bacterial infection, categorized as definite, likely, unlikely, or definitely none. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 300 patients with suspected serious bacterial infections, mean age was 68 years ( sd 18), median hospital length of stay was 5 days (interquartile range, 3–8 d), 45 (15%) were admitted directly to ICU, and 14 (5%) died in hospital. Overall, 196 (65%) had definite ( n = 115; 38%) or likely ( n = 81; 27%) bacterial infection, whereas 104 (35%) were unlikely ( n = 55; 18%) or definitely not infected ( n = 49; 16%). Antibiotic treatment durations differed by likelihood of infection (median 15 days for definite, 9 for likely, 7 for unlikely, and 3 for definitely not infected). The most frequent post hoc diagnoses in patients with unlikely or definitely no bacterial infection included viral infections (28%), volume overload or cardiac disease (9%), drug effects (9%), and hypovolemia (7%). The likelihoods of infection were similar in the subset of 96 cases in whom emergency department providers explicitly documented possible or suspected sepsis and in the 45 patients admitted from the emergency department to the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: One third of patients empirically treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics in the emergency department are ultimately diagnosed with noninfectious or viral conditions. These findings underscore the difficulty diagnosing serious infections in the emergency department and have important implications for guidelines and quality measures that compel immediate empiric antibiotics for all patients with possible sepsis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005090

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shappell, C. N., Klompas, M., Ochoa, A., & Rhee, C.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2021-05-07
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
e1144-e1150
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160241186
Cited by
68
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U54CK000484)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007633)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
broad-spectrum antibiotics, empirical antibiotic therapy, sepsis, serious bacterial infection, emergency department, viral infection, antibiotic overuse, quality metrics, antibiotic stewardship, blood culture
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Infections, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sepsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review