Cited by 108

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Practice and perception—A nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis*

Brunkhorst, Frank M., Engel, Christoph, Ragaller, Max, Welte, Tobias, Rossaint, Rolf, Gerlach, Herwig, Mayer, Konstantin, John, Stefan, Stuber, Frank, Weiler, Norbert, Oppert, Michael, Moerer, Onnen, Bogatsch, Holger, Reinhart, Konrad, Loeffler, Markus, Hartog, Christiane·2008·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objective To simultaneously determine perceived vs. practiced adherence to recommended interventions for the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock. Design One-day cross-sectional survey. Setting Representative sample of German intensive care units stratified by hospital size. Patients Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Interventions None. Measurements and main results Practice recommendations were selected by German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) investigators. External intensivists visited intensive care units randomly chosen and asked the responsible intensive care unit director how often these recommendations were used. Responses "always" and "frequently" were combined to depict perceived adherence. Thereafter patient files were audited. Three hundred sixty-six patients on 214 intensive care units fulfilled the criteria and received full support. One hundred fifty-two patients had acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Low-tidal volume ventilation 8 mL/kg predicted body weight. Mean tidal volume was 10.0 +/- 2.4 mL/kg predicted body weight. Perceived adherence to low-tidal volume ventilation was 79.9%. Euglycemia (4.4-6.1 mmol/L) was documented in 6.2% of 355 patients. A total of 33.8% of patients had blood glucose levels 8.3 mmol/L). Among 207 patients receiving insulin therapy, 1.9% were euglycemic, 20.8% had blood glucose levels Conclusions This representative survey shows that current therapy of severe sepsis in German intens…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318186b6f3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practicing physicians struggle to reiterate consensus definitions and implement best practices for sepsis.

    “Multiple studies have found that practicing physicians struggle to reiterate the consensus definitions and implement best practices for sepsis, despite the syndrome being the leading cause of infectious disease mortality among their patients (Poeze et al., 2004; Brunkhorst et al., 2008).”

    From On race, human variation, and who gets and dies of sepsis (2022) · cites this paper as Brunkhorst et al., 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Annane, 2002, JAMA, 288, 862, 10.1001/jama.288.7.862 · DOI
  2. Bernard, 2001, N Engl J Med, 344, 699, 10.1056/NEJM200103083441001 · DOI
  3. Rivers, 2001, N Engl J Med, 345, 1368, 10.1056/NEJMoa010307 · DOI · Paper page
  4. van den Berghe, 2001, N Engl J Med, 345, 1359, 10.1056/NEJMoa011300 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2000, N Engl J Med, 342, 1301, 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Warren, 2001, JAMA, 286, 1869, 10.1001/jama.286.15.1869 · DOI
  7. Bellomo, 2000, Lancet, 356, 2139, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03495-4 · DOI
  8. 1999, Crit Care Med, 27, 639, 10.1097/00003246-199903000-00049 · DOI
  9. 2001, Intensive Care Med, 27, S1, 10.1007/s001340000767 · DOI
  10. Ketley, 1993, Lancet, 342, 891, 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91945-I · DOI
  11. Kallet, 2005, Crit Care Med, 33, 925, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000162382.59289.9C · DOI
  12. Cook, 2002, Crit Care Med, 30, 1472, 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00012 · DOI
  13. Akhtar, 2003, Chest, 124, 2275, 10.1378/chest.124.6.2275 · DOI
  14. Pittet, 2004, Ann Intern Med, 141, 1, 10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00008 · DOI
  15. Pancu, 2003, J Emerg Med, 24, 379, 10.1016/S0736-4679(03)00033-7 · DOI
  16. Engel, 2007, Intensive Care Med, 33, 606, 10.1007/s00134-006-0517-7 · DOI
  17. Thompson, 2001, Chest, 120, 1622, 10.1378/chest.120.5.1622 · DOI
  18. Young, 2004, Crit Care Med, 32, 1260, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000127784.54727.56 · DOI
  19. Kalhan, 2006, Crit Care Med, 34, 300, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000198328.83571.4A · DOI
  20. Karlsson, 2007, Intensive Care Med, 33, 435, 10.1007/s00134-006-0504-z · DOI
  21. Bradley, 2004, Qual Saf Health Care, 13, 26, 10.1136/qhc.13.1.26 · DOI
  22. Krinsley, 2004, Mayo Clin Proc, 79, 992, 10.4065/79.8.992 · DOI
  23. Dellinger, 2004, Crit Care Med, 32, 858, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000117317.18092.E4 · DOI
  24. De Jonghe, 2002, JAMA, 288, 2859, 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859 · DOI
  25. Rubenfeld, 2004, Curr Opin Crit Care, 10, 33, 10.1097/00075198-200402000-00006 · DOI
  26. Rothwell, 2005, Lancet, 365, 82, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Pronovost, 2003, J Crit Care, 18, 71, 10.1053/jcrc.2003.50008 · DOI
  28. Slomka, 2000, Am J Crit Care, 9, 412, 10.4037/ajcc2000.9.6.412 · DOI
  29. Reinertsen, 2003, Ann Intern Med, 138, 992, 10.7326/0003-4819-138-12-200306170-00011 · DOI
  30. Boldt, 2005, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 130, 87, 10.1055/s-2005-837379 · DOI
  31. Rubenfeld, 2004, Crit Care Med, 32, 1289, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000127266.39560.96 · DOI
  32. McMullin, 2004, Intensive Care Med, 30, 798, 10.1007/s00134-004-2242-4 · DOI
  33. Sprung, 2008, N Engl J Med, 358, 111, 10.1056/NEJMoa071366 · DOI
  34. Angus, 2005, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 172, 1358, 10.1164/rccm.2508009 · DOI
  35. Eichacker, 2003, Crit Care Med, 31, S94, 10.1097/00003246-200301001-00013 · DOI
  36. Gale, 2004, QJM, 97, 439, 10.1093/qjmed/hch070 · DOI
  37. O’Boyle, 2001, Am J Infect Control, 29, 352, 10.1067/mic.2001.18405 · DOI
  38. Thomas, 2003, Crit Care Med, 31, 956, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000056183.89175.76 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brunkhorst, F. M., Engel, C., Ragaller, M., Welte, T., Rossaint, R., Gerlach, H., Mayer, K., John, S., Stuber, F., Weiler, N., Oppert, M., Moerer, O., Bogatsch, H., Reinhart, K., Loeffler, M., & Hartog, C.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2008-10
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
2719-2725
ISSN
0090-3493
Cited by
108
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review