The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practice and perception—A nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis*
Abstract
Objective To simultaneously determine perceived vs. practiced adherence to recommended interventions for the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock. Design One-day cross-sectional survey. Setting Representative sample of German intensive care units stratified by hospital size. Patients Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Interventions None. Measurements and main results Practice recommendations were selected by German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) investigators. External intensivists visited intensive care units randomly chosen and asked the responsible intensive care unit director how often these recommendations were used. Responses "always" and "frequently" were combined to depict perceived adherence. Thereafter patient files were audited. Three hundred sixty-six patients on 214 intensive care units fulfilled the criteria and received full support. One hundred fifty-two patients had acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Low-tidal volume ventilation 8 mL/kg predicted body weight. Mean tidal volume was 10.0 +/- 2.4 mL/kg predicted body weight. Perceived adherence to low-tidal volume ventilation was 79.9%. Euglycemia (4.4-6.1 mmol/L) was documented in 6.2% of 355 patients. A total of 33.8% of patients had blood glucose levels 8.3 mmol/L). Among 207 patients receiving insulin therapy, 1.9% were euglycemic, 20.8% had blood glucose levels Conclusions This representative survey shows that current therapy of severe sepsis in German intens…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Practicing physicians struggle to reiterate consensus definitions and implement best practices for sepsis.
“Multiple studies have found that practicing physicians struggle to reiterate the consensus definitions and implement best practices for sepsis, despite the syndrome being the leading cause of infectious disease mortality among their patients (Poeze et al., 2004; Brunkhorst et al., 2008).”
From On race, human variation, and who gets and dies of sepsis (2022) · cites this paper as Brunkhorst et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000
Martin, G. S., Mannino, D. M., Eaton, S., & Moss, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022139 · Cited by 5,841
Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU
Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Hermans, G., Meersseman, W., Wouters, P. J., Milants, I., Van Wijngaerden, E., Bobbaers, H., & Bouillon, R. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052521 · Cited by 3,639
Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis
Brunkhorst, F. M., Engel, C., Bloos, F., Meier-Hellmann, A., Ragaller, M., Weiler, N., Moerer, O., Gruendling, M., Oppert, M., Grond, S., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa070716 · Cited by 2,921
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Annane, 2002, JAMA, 288, 862, 10.1001/jama.288.7.862 · DOI
- Bernard, 2001, N Engl J Med, 344, 699, 10.1056/NEJM200103083441001 · DOI
- Rivers, 2001, N Engl J Med, 345, 1368, 10.1056/NEJMoa010307 · DOI · Paper page
- van den Berghe, 2001, N Engl J Med, 345, 1359, 10.1056/NEJMoa011300 · DOI · Paper page
- 2000, N Engl J Med, 342, 1301, 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801 · DOI · Paper page
- Warren, 2001, JAMA, 286, 1869, 10.1001/jama.286.15.1869 · DOI
- Bellomo, 2000, Lancet, 356, 2139, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03495-4 · DOI
- 1999, Crit Care Med, 27, 639, 10.1097/00003246-199903000-00049 · DOI
- 2001, Intensive Care Med, 27, S1, 10.1007/s001340000767 · DOI
- Ketley, 1993, Lancet, 342, 891, 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91945-I · DOI
- Kallet, 2005, Crit Care Med, 33, 925, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000162382.59289.9C · DOI
- Cook, 2002, Crit Care Med, 30, 1472, 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00012 · DOI
- Akhtar, 2003, Chest, 124, 2275, 10.1378/chest.124.6.2275 · DOI
- Pittet, 2004, Ann Intern Med, 141, 1, 10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00008 · DOI
- Pancu, 2003, J Emerg Med, 24, 379, 10.1016/S0736-4679(03)00033-7 · DOI
- Engel, 2007, Intensive Care Med, 33, 606, 10.1007/s00134-006-0517-7 · DOI
- Thompson, 2001, Chest, 120, 1622, 10.1378/chest.120.5.1622 · DOI
- Young, 2004, Crit Care Med, 32, 1260, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000127784.54727.56 · DOI
- Kalhan, 2006, Crit Care Med, 34, 300, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000198328.83571.4A · DOI
- Karlsson, 2007, Intensive Care Med, 33, 435, 10.1007/s00134-006-0504-z · DOI
- Bradley, 2004, Qual Saf Health Care, 13, 26, 10.1136/qhc.13.1.26 · DOI
- Krinsley, 2004, Mayo Clin Proc, 79, 992, 10.4065/79.8.992 · DOI
- Dellinger, 2004, Crit Care Med, 32, 858, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000117317.18092.E4 · DOI
- De Jonghe, 2002, JAMA, 288, 2859, 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859 · DOI
- Rubenfeld, 2004, Curr Opin Crit Care, 10, 33, 10.1097/00075198-200402000-00006 · DOI
- Rothwell, 2005, Lancet, 365, 82, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Pronovost, 2003, J Crit Care, 18, 71, 10.1053/jcrc.2003.50008 · DOI
- Slomka, 2000, Am J Crit Care, 9, 412, 10.4037/ajcc2000.9.6.412 · DOI
- Reinertsen, 2003, Ann Intern Med, 138, 992, 10.7326/0003-4819-138-12-200306170-00011 · DOI
- Boldt, 2005, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 130, 87, 10.1055/s-2005-837379 · DOI
- Rubenfeld, 2004, Crit Care Med, 32, 1289, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000127266.39560.96 · DOI
- McMullin, 2004, Intensive Care Med, 30, 798, 10.1007/s00134-004-2242-4 · DOI
- Sprung, 2008, N Engl J Med, 358, 111, 10.1056/NEJMoa071366 · DOI
- Angus, 2005, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 172, 1358, 10.1164/rccm.2508009 · DOI
- Eichacker, 2003, Crit Care Med, 31, S94, 10.1097/00003246-200301001-00013 · DOI
- Gale, 2004, QJM, 97, 439, 10.1093/qjmed/hch070 · DOI
- O’Boyle, 2001, Am J Infect Control, 29, 352, 10.1067/mic.2001.18405 · DOI
- Thomas, 2003, Crit Care Med, 31, 956, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000056183.89175.76 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bloos, F., Thomas-Rüddel, D., Rüddel, H., Engel, C., Schwarzkopf, D., Marshall, J. C., Harbarth, S., Simon, P., Riessen, R., Keh, D., et al. (2014) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc13755 · Cited by 240
Self-citationSepsis guideline implementation: benefits, pitfalls and possible solutions
Kissoon, N. (2014) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc13774 · Cited by 25
On race, human variation, and who gets and dies of sepsis
Brinkworth, J. F., & Shaw, J. G. (2022) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24527 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunkhorst, F. M., Engel, C., Ragaller, M., Welte, T., Rossaint, R., Gerlach, H., Mayer, K., John, S., Stuber, F., Weiler, N., Oppert, M., Moerer, O., Bogatsch, H., Reinhart, K., Loeffler, M., & Hartog, C.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2719-2725
- ISSN
- 0090-3493
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review