The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of sublingual and gut mucosal microcirculation in sepsis: A quantitative analysis*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between sublingual and intestinal mucosal microcirculatory perfusion. DESIGN: Observational, experimental study. SETTING: University-affiliated large animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Ten fasted, anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, male pigs randomized to a sham group (n = 3) or to a hyperdynamic septic shock group (n = 7) in which cholangitis was induced by direct infusion of Escherichia coli into the common bile duct. This model was developed because it is not accompanied by changes in intra-abdominal pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The sublingual and intestinal microcirculations were simultaneously assessed at 4-hr intervals for up to 12 hrs with a modified orthogonal polarization spectral device and functional microvessel density and erythrocyte velocity were measured quantitatively. In sham animals, both regions maintained a stable functional microvessel density and erythrocyte velocity throughout the study period. In contrast, in septic animals, already after 4 hrs of sepsis, functional microvessel density was markedly decreased (>50%) in the sublingual and gut regions; mean erythrocyte velocity decreased dramatically and similarly in both regions, from 1022 +/- 80 to 265 +/- 43 mum/sec in the sublingual region and from 1068 +/- 45 to 243 +/- 115 mum/sec in the gut (p < 0.001, at T12). There was a significant correlation between the sublingual and gut microcirculations in septic animals (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The severity and the time course of microcirculatory changes were similar in the sublingual and in the gut region in this clinically relevant model of severe sepsis. These findings support the sublingual region as an appropriate region to monitor the microcirculation in sepsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiology of microcirculatory dysfunction and the pathogenesis of septic shock
De Backer, D., Orbegozo Cortes, D., Donadello, K., & Vincent, J.-L. (2014) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.26482 · Cited by 393
Self-citationEffects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis
Ospina-Tascon, G., Neves, A. P., Occhipinti, G., Donadello, K., Büchele, G., Simion, D., Chierego, M.-L., Silva, T. O., Fonseca, A., Vincent, J.-L., et al. (2010) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-010-1843-3 · Cited by 323
Self-citationSepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury
Manrique-Caballero, C. L., Del Rio-Pertuz, G., & Gomez, H. (2021) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2020.11.010 · Cited by 312
van Wijck, K., Lenaerts, K., Grootjans, J., Wijnands, K. A. P., Poeze, M., van Loon, L. J. C., Dejong, C. H. C., & Buurman, W. A. (2012) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00066.2012 · Cited by 285
Wijnands, K. A. P., Vink, H., Briedé, J. J., van Faassen, E. E., Lamers, W. H., Buurman, W. A., & Poeze, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037439 · Cited by 136
“Furthermore, the characteristics of the microcirculation according to de Backer et al [2,40,41] were analyzed using the Automated Vascular Analysis software 3.0 (Microscan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).”
MethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Verdant, C. L., De Backer, D., Bruhn, A., Clausi, C. M., Su, F., Wang, Z., Rodriguez, H., Pries, A. R., & Vincent, J.-L.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2875-2881
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042251693
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of sublingual and gut mucosal microcirculation in sepsis: A quantitative analysis*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b029c1
- The paper
- Verdant, C. L., De Backer, D., Bruhn, A., Clausi, C. M., Su, F., Wang, Z., Rodriguez, H., Pries, A. R., & Vincent, J.-L. (2009). Evaluation of sublingual and gut mucosal microcirculation in sepsis: A quantitative analysis*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b029c1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.