Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 677

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PELOD-2: An Update of the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score

Leteurtre, Stéphane, Duhamel, Alain, Salleron, Julia, Grandbastien, Bruno, Lacroix, Jacques, Leclerc, Francis·2013·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is the main cause of death in adult ICUs and in PICUs. The PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score developed in 1999 was primarily designed to describe the severity of organ dysfunction. This study was undertaken to update and improve the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score, using a larger and more recent dataset. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Nine multidisciplinary, tertiary-care PICUs of university-affiliated hospitals in France and Belgium. PATIENTS: All consecutive children admitted to these PICUs (June 2006-October 2007). INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected data on variables considered for the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score during PICU stay up to eight time points: days 1, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, and 18, plus PICU discharge. For each variable considered for the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score, the most abnormal value observed during time points was collected. The outcome was vital status at PICU discharge. Identification of the best variable cutoffs was performed using bivariate analyses. The PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score was developed by multivariable logistic regressions and bootstrap process. We used areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve to evaluate discrimination and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests to evaluate calibration. We enrolled 3,671 consecutive patients (median age, 15.5 mo; interquartile range, 2.2-70.7). Mortality rate was 6.0% (222 deaths). The PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score includes ten variables corresponding to five organ dysfunctions. Discrimination (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.934) and calibration (chi-square test for goodness-of-fit = 9.31, p = 0.317) of the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score were good. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score, which allows assessment of the severity of cases of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in the PICU with a continuous scale. The PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score now includes mean arterial pressure and lactatemia in the cardiovascular dysfunction and does not include hepatic dysfunction. The score will be in the public domain, which means that it can be freely used in clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31828a2bbd

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 677

Metadata

Authors
Leteurtre, S., Duhamel, A., Salleron, J., Grandbastien, B., Lacroix, J., & Leclerc, F.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2013-07
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1761-1773
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321829810
Cited by
677
References
23
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PELOD-2: An Update of the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31828a2bbd
The paper
Leteurtre, S., Duhamel, A., Salleron, J., Grandbastien, B., Lacroix, J., & Leclerc, F. (2013). PELOD-2: An Update of the PEdiatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31828a2bbd

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.