Cited by 79Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research

Immune checkpoint blockade for organ transplant patients with advanced cancer: how far can we go?

Open access
De Bruyn, Pauline, Van Gestel, Dirk, Ost, Piet, Kruse, Vibeke, Brochez, Lieve, Van Vlierberghe, Hans, Devresse, Arnaud, del Marmol, Véronique +2 more·2019·Current Opinion in Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) provide impressive response rates among immunocompetent patients with various solid tumors. So far, organ transplant recipients have been excluded from clinical studies due to the putative risk of allograft rejection however 48 cases of liver and renal transplant patients treated with CPI were already described in literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Here we discuss 19 cases of liver and 29 cases of renal transplant patients who received CPI for advanced cancer. Disease control rate [stable disease, complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) together] was 35% (21% for liver and 45% for kidney transplant patients). Graft rejection was seen in 37% of liver and 45% and kidney transplant patients. Significantly, our analysis shows that an 'ideal' response occurs in 21% of all patients (antitumor response accompanied with durable graft tolerance). SUMMARY: We believe that transplant patients can be treated with CPI in a controlled setting and for well informed patients. To obtain a durable antitumor immune response while avoiding rejection, to be able to adjust immunosuppression and to have the opportunity to develop biomarkers for tumor response and transplant rejection, these patients should be treated according to a clinical care path or a prospective clinical trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/cco.0000000000000505

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Bruyn, P., Van Gestel, D., Ost, P., Kruse, V., Brochez, L., Van Vlierberghe, H., Devresse, A., del Marmol, V., Le Moine, A., & Aspeslagh, S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet – ULB, Brussels
  • Department of Radiation Oncology
  • Department of Medical Oncology
  • Department of Dermatology
  • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
  • Department of Nephrology, Erasme Hospital
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Aspeslagh, Sandrine
Venue
Current Opinion in Oncology
Published
2019-03
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
54-64
ISSN
  • 1040-8746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-703X
OpenAlex
W2920257990
Cited by
79
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
Keywords
immune checkpoint inhibitors, organ transplant recipients, liver transplantation, kidney transplantation, allograft rejection, graft tolerance, advanced cancer, immunosuppression, antitumor immunity, inclusion and exclusion criteria
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Liver Neoplasms, Kidney Transplantation, CTLA-4 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review