Cited by 58Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Varying the Wear Time of the Methylphenidate Transdermal System in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

WILENS, TIMOTHY E., BOELLNER, SAMUEL W., LÓPEZ, FRANK A., TURNBOW, JOHN M., WIGAL, SHARON B., CHILDRESS, ANN C., ABIKOFF, HOWARD B., MANOS, MICHAEL J.·2008·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder often have varying needs for coverage of their symptoms throughout the day. The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy, duration of action, and safety of methylphenidate transdermal system worn for variable times by children (ages 6-12) diagnosed with ADHD. Method Methylphenidate dose was optimized over 5 weeks using 10-, 15-, 20-, or 30-mg patches worn for 9 hours. The efficacy of 4- and 6-hour wear times was then assessed in an Analog Classroom setting during a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-way crossover phase. The main efficacy measures were the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale deportment scale and the Permanent Product Measure of Performance math test. Results All of the efficacy measures indicated that 4- and 6-hour wear times improved ADHD symptoms and that medication effects on the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale deportment scale and Permanent Product Measure of Performance math test decreased between 2 and 4 hours after patch removal. The majority of adverse events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions These findings suggest that the duration of medication effect is related to the wear time of the patch and may be tailored to accommodate the schedules of patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/chi.0b013e31816bffdf

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILENS, T. E., BOELLNER, S. W., LÓPEZ, F. A., TURNBOW, J. M., WIGAL, S. B., CHILDRESS, A. C., ABIKOFF, H. B., & MANOS, M. J.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
WILENS, TIMOTHY E.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
700-708
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094244099
Cited by
58
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
methylphenidate, transdermal patch, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, duration of action, adverse events, dose optimization
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Personality Assessment, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review