Cited by 13Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationElectronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health Information

Nursing Documentation Variation Across Different Medical Facilities Within an Integrated Healthcare System

Open access
Kang, Min-Jeoung, Rossetti, Sarah Collins, Knaplund, Christopher, Chang, Frank Y., Schnock, Kumiko O., Whalen, Kimberly, Gesner, Emily J., Garcia, Jose P. +2 more·2021·CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate nursing documentation variation based on electronic health record design and its relationship with different levels of care by reviewing how various flowsheet measures, within the same electronic health record across an integrated healthcare system, are documented in different types of medical facilities. Flowsheet data with information on patients who were admitted to academic medical centers, community hospitals, and rehabilitation centers were used to calculate the frequency of flowsheet entries documented. We then compared the distinct flowsheet measures documented in five flowsheet templates across the different facilities. We observed that each type of healthcare facility appeared to have distinct clinical care foci and flowsheet measures documented differed within the same template based on facility type. Designing flowsheets tailored to study settings can meet the needs of end users and increase documentation efficiency by reducing time spent on unrelated flowsheet measures. Furthermore, this process can save nurses time for direct patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/cin.0000000000000736

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distinct distribution might reflect different nursing workflow and documentation patterns across care units.

    “This might reflect different nursing workflow and documentation patterns across care units.49”

    From Electronic health record system use and documentation burden of acute and critical care nurse clinicians: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Discussion reports that nursing documentation differed across facility types and links those differences to patient-care workflows. The study compares academic medical centers, community hospitals, and rehabilitation centers, not documentation patterns across care units within a facility, so the claim changes the setting of the comparison. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Korst LM, Eusebio-Angeja AC, Chamorro T, Aydin CE, Gregory KD. Nursing documentation time during implementation of an electronic medical record. Evaluating the organizational impact of healthcare information systems: Springer; 2005: 304– 314.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, M.-J., Rossetti, S. C., Knaplund, C., Chang, F. Y., Schnock, K. O., Whalen, K., Gesner, E. J., Garcia, J. P., Cato, K. D., & Dykes, P. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Cape Cod Community College (US)
Venue
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
Published
2021-05-03
Volume
39
Issue
12
Pages
845-850
ISSN
  • 1538-2931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9774
OpenAlex
W3157926389
Cited by
13
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CIN Computers Informatics Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR016941)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
nursing documentation, electronic health records, flowsheet design, integrated health system, academic medical centers, community hospitals, rehabilitation centers, documentation efficiency, nursing workload
MeSH terms
Documentation, Humans, Nursing Care, Nursing Records, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review