Cited by 9Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationElectronic Health Records SystemsNursing education and management

Using Newly Developed Software to Enhance the Efficiency of the Nursing Process in Patient Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Alsadat Hosseini, Fahimeh, Parvan, Kobra, Jasemi, Madineh, Parizad, Naser, Esmaili Zabihi, Roghayeh, Aazami, Sanaz·2021·CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing

Abstract

The nursing process is a systematic decision-making method of problem-solving that increases the quality of patient care. Implementation of modern technology in nursing can reduce documentation time, make nursing care safer, and improve the quality of patient care. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of applying newly developed nursing process software on the efficiency of the nursing process in patient care. In this randomized clinical trial, 80 nursing students were randomly allocated into intervention (n = 40) and control (n = 40) groups. The student in the intervention group used the software to care for patients for two semesters. Students in the control group used routine hospital protocol to care for their patients. Modified Brooking nursing process measuring scale was used to evaluate the effectiveness of software before and after the intervention. The results showed a statistically significant difference in the mean efficiency score of the nursing process in the two groups after the intervention (P < .001). Using nursing process software leads to increasing the efficiency of the nursing process in patient care. Thus, providing executive support and electronic resources with relevant training for nursing students can be beneficial in students' education and be a practical application of the nursing process in caring for patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/cin.0000000000000772

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alsadat Hosseini, F., Parvan, K., Jasemi, M., Parizad, N., Esmaili Zabihi, R., & Aazami, S.
Affiliations
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Venue
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
Published
2021-07-09
Volume
39
Issue
11
Pages
696-703
ISSN
  • 1538-2931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9774
OpenAlex
W3182091872
Cited by
9
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CIN Computers Informatics Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
nursing process, nursing documentation, nursing students, nursing education, patient care efficiency, electronic health records, nursing informatics
MeSH terms
Patient Care, Humans, Nursing Process, Software, Students, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review