The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous melanoma: state of the art 2006*
Abstract
Although the incidence of melanoma is still rising in Caucasian populations, the increase in mortality has leveled off. Improvements in early diagnosis, with more frequent diagnosis of low-risk patients (i.e. those with <1 mm of tumor thickness), is the main reason for these divergent developments. Primary prevention has not yet been successful and recent studies have demonstrated the lack of effectiveness of sunscreen in preventing nevi in children. Progress was made in early melanoma diagnosis when dermoscopy and digital dermoscopy were introduced, and computer algorithms have proved to be highly efficacious for automated melanoma diagnosis. Primary melanomas are now excised with narrower surgical margins of 1-2 cm. Sentinel-node biopsy is recommended as a nodal staging procedure in patients with tumor thickness of 1 mm and more, but the prognostic impact of this procedure has not yet been demonstrated. New imaging techniques, e.g. whole-body MRI and PET-CT, provide more accurate staging, particularly in patients with apparent metastasis, and facilitate decisions on surgical treatment strategies. Staging is now based on the 2001 TNM classification including tumor thickness and histopathologic ulceration in stages I and II and lymph node micro and macro-metastasis in stage III. A stage- and risk-adopted follow-up schedule is proposed for melanoma surveillance. Adjuvant therapy with interferon-alpha in high-risk patients offers a small benefit in terms of recurrence-free and overall survival; the optimal dosage and duration of this treatment are still to be defined. Almost no progress has been made in the medical treatment of disseminated metastasis of melanoma. Therapy with dacarbazine and a few other single agents remains the first-line treatment approach of choice. A number of new treatment modalities, including targeted molecules and immunologic approaches with monoclonal antibodies, are under development; hopefully, new treatment modalities will be available in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mocellin, S., Pasquali, S., Rossi, C. R., & Nitti, D. (2010) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djq009 · Cited by 527
Direct Effects of Type I Interferons on Cells of the Immune System
Hervas-Stubbs, S., Perez-Gracia, J. L., Rouzaut, A., Sanmamed, M. F., Le Bon, A., & Melero, I. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1114 · Cited by 503
Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline
Garbe, C., Peris, K., Hauschild, A., Saiag, P., Middleton, M., Spatz, A., Grob, J.-J., Malvehy, J., Newton-Bishop, J., Stratigos, A., et al. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.10.032 · Cited by 317
Self-citationCallaghan, T. M., & Wilhelm, K. ‐. (2008) · International Journal of Cosmetic Science · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00454.x · Cited by 149
Antonio, J. R., Antonio, C. R., Cardeal, I. L. S., Ballavenuto, J. M. A., & Oliveira, J. R. (2014) · Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia · doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142228 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Garbe, C., & Eigentler, T. K.
- Venue
- Melanoma Research
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-127
- ISSN
- 0960-8931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088656570
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous melanoma: state of the art 2006*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/cmr.0b013e328042bb36
- The paper
- Garbe, C., & Eigentler, T. K. (2007). Diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous melanoma: state of the art 2006*. Melanoma Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/cmr.0b013e328042bb36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.