Cited by 13Connective tissue disorders researchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Joint Hypermobility Classes in 9-Year-Old Children from the General Population and Anxiety Symptoms

Open access
Ezpeleta, Lourdes, Navarro, José Blas, Osa, Núria de la, Penelo, Eva, Bulbena, Antoni·2018·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To obtain joint hypermobility classes in children from the general population and to study their characteristics in relation to anxiety measures. Methods A total of 336 nine-year-old children from the general population were clinically assessed through 9 items of hypermobility, and their parents reported about the severity of anxiety symptoms. Latent class analysis was estimated to group the children according to the presence of hypermobility symptoms, and the obtained classes were related to anxiety. Results A 2-class solution, labeled as high hypermobility and low hypermobility, best fitted the data. Children in the high hypermobility group scored higher in separation anxiety, social phobia, physical injury fears, and total anxiety than did those in the low group. When applying the threshold reference scores to the total anxiety score, 7.4% of children in the high hypermobility group versus 6% in the low group were reported to experience clinical elevations on total anxiety. Conclusion High symptoms of hypermobility are associated with higher scores in anxiety symptoms in children from the general population. Children with frequent symptoms of hypermobility may benefit from screening for anxiety symptoms because a subset of them are experiencing clinical elevations and may need comprehensive physical and psychological treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000577

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ezpeleta, L., Navarro, J. B., Osa, N. D. L., Penelo, E., & Bulbena, A.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Departament de Psiquiatria i Medicina Legal, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;
Corresponding author
  • Ezpeleta, Lourdes
  • Navarro, José Blas
  • Penelo, Eva
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2018-07
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
481-488
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807415669
Cited by
13
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
joint hypermobility, childhood anxiety, separation anxiety, social anxiety disorder, anxiety screening, nine-year-old children, latent class analysis
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Spain, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review