Cited by 41Connective tissue disorders researchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Updates on the psychological and psychiatric aspects of the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes and hypermobility spectrum disorders

Bulbena‐Cabré, Andrea, Baeza‐Velasco, Carolina, Rosado‐Figuerola, Silvia, Bulbena, Antonio·2021·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics

Abstract

The field of the psychiatric and psychological aspects of Ehlers–Danlos syndromes (EDS) has been understudied and neglected for many years. People with EDS are often classified as “somatizers” by untrained clinicians. However, research on the biological basis of EDS is improving our understanding of the physiology and psychopathology of the disorder. In this article, we consider the literature on the psychopathological dimensions associated with EDS as well as the EDS symptoms in psychiatric conditions since our review in 2017. Literature confirms that psychological processes (i.e., fear, emotional distress, or negative emotions) in EDS have a significant impact on the outcomes of EDS. Common systemic associations are found between anxiety disorders and EDS as well as significant correlations with neurodevelopmental, eating, mood, and sleep disorders. There is limited but increasing evidence of an association between EDS and suicidal thoughts and behaviors, which should be further explored. The broad spectrum of human anxiety and associated somatic symptoms (beyond anxiety disorders) appears to be the core of the psychopathology in EDS and therefore, detecting and assessing EDS might be a new opportunity for psychiatric nosology to develop more inclusive phenotypes like the Neuroconnective Phenotype that include both somatic and psychological manifestations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.c.31955

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bulbena‐Cabré, A., Baeza‐Velasco, C., Rosado‐Figuerola, S., & Bulbena, A.
Affiliations
  • New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institut Neuropsychiatry and Addictions Parc Salut Mar, Hospital del Mar Barcelona Spain
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Bulbena, Antonio
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-22
Volume
187
Issue
4
Pages
482-490
ISSN
  • 1552-4868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4876
OpenAlex
W3214781819
Cited by
41
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility spectrum disorders, psychopathology, anxiety disorders, somatization, emotional distress, suicidal ideation, mood disorders, sleep disorders, eating disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, psychiatric classification, somatic symptoms
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Humans, Joint Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review