Cited by 29Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Mothers’ Perspectives on Follow-up for Postpartum Depression Screening in Primary Care

Canty, Hannah R., Sauter, Alicia, Zuckerman, Katharine, Cobian, Maritza, Grigsby, Tamara·2019·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively assess mothers' perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of follow-up of at-risk postpartum depression (PPD) screening test results. METHODS: We conducted semistructured qualitative telephone interviews with 17 women who scored in the moderate or high-risk range on the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Interviews explored personal experience with depressive symptoms, barriers and facilitators to receiving mental health care postpartum, and suggestions for primary care follow-up of at-risk screens. The team created a coding structure that was updated during review of transcripts. Findings were triangulated and external validity assessed via discussions with a mother who experienced PPD, a perinatal social worker, and a perinatal psychologist. RESULTS: Personal health/attitude, family/friends, community, and health care system factors influenced mothers' follow-up of at-risk PPD screening test results. Health and personal attitude factors included anxiety, physical and emotional exhaustion, self-care and recognition of symptoms, and living up to personal and family expectations. Family/friend factors included material and emotional support and competing priorities. Community factors included child care affordability and availability, access to transportation, geographic access to resources, social networks, and community mental health stigma. Health care factors included pediatrician taking the mother's symptoms seriously, adequate time with the pediatrician, mother and pediatrician focus on the child's health, and access to mental health referrals. CONCLUSION: Addressing barriers to follow-up after PPD screening may enable better service access for at-risk families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000628

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canty, H. R., Sauter, A., Zuckerman, K., Cobian, M., & Grigsby, T.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Hillsboro Pediatrics, Hillsboro, OR;
  • Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Canty, Hannah R.
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2019-02
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
139-143
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901019923
Cited by
29
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, postpartum depression screening, follow-up care, barriers to care, facilitators of care, mothers' perspectives, primary care, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, access to mental health care, family support, childcare access, mental health referral
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aftercare, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mothers, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Primary Health Care, Depression, Postpartum, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review