Cited by 32Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Quantifying the Impact of Accessibility on Preventive Healthcare in Sub-Saharan Africa Using Mobile Phone Data

Open access
Wesolowski, Amy, O’Meara, Wendy Prudhomme, Tatem, Andrew J., Ndege, Samson, Eagle, Nathan, Buckee, Caroline O.·2015·Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor physical access to health facilities has been identified as an important contributor to reduced uptake of preventive health services and is likely to be most critical in low-income settings. However, the relation among physical access, travel behavior, and the uptake of healthcare is difficult to quantify. METHODS: Using anonymized mobile phone data from 2008 to 2009, we analyze individual and spatially aggregated travel patterns of 14,816,521 subscribers across Kenya and compare these measures to (1) estimated travel times to health facilities and (2) data on the uptake of 2 preventive healthcare interventions in an area of western Kenya: childhood immunizations and antenatal care. RESULTS: We document that long travel times to health facilities are strongly correlated with increased mobility in geographically isolated areas. Furthermore, we found that in areas with equal physical access to healthcare, mobile phone-derived measures of mobility predict which regions are lacking preventive care. CONCLUSIONS: Routinely collected mobile phone data provide a simple and low-cost approach to mapping the uptake of preventive healthcare in low-income settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0000000000000239

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long travel times to health facilities strongly correlate with increased mobility in geographically isolated areas.

    “They found that long travel times to health facilities strongly correlate with increased mobility in geographically isolated areas.”
  • Mobile phone-derived measures of mobility can predict which regions are lacking preventive care.

    “Furthermore, they have shown that the mobile phone-derived measures of mobility can predict which regions are lacking preventive care.”
  • A study used cell tower location data from 14 million subscribers tracked for a year in rural Kenya to find the correlation between the mobility of the people, access to healthcare and uptake of two preventive healthcare interventions: childhood immunizations and antenatal care.

    “A study [121] used cell tower location data from 14 million subscribers tracked for a year in rural Kenya to find the correlation between the mobility of the people, access to healthcare and uptake of two preventive healthcare interventions: childhood immunizations and antenatal care.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Blondel VD Esch M Chan C Data for development: the D4D challenge on mobile phone data. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.0137. Accessed September 1, 2014. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wesolowski, A., O’Meara, W. P., Tatem, A. J., Ndege, S., Eagle, N., & Buckee, C. O.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Moi University (KE)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Buckee, Caroline O.
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2015-03
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
223-228
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122746356
Cited by
32
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0750271)
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP#1032350)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM088558)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI089674)
  • Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
health care access, travel time to health facilities, mobile phone data, travel behavior, childhood immunization, prenatal care, low-income settings, Kenya
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Preschool, Developing Countries, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Kenya, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Time Factors, Travel, Vaccination, Health Care Surveys, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review