Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Among Breast Cancer Survivors

Open access
Bradshaw, Patrick T., Stevens, June, Khankari, Nikhil, Teitelbaum, Susan L., Neugut, Alfred I., Gammon, Marilie D.·2016·Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is of increasing concern among breast cancer survivors. However, the burden of this comorbidity in this group relative to the general population, and its temporal pattern, remains unknown. METHODS: We compared deaths due to CVD in a population-based sample of 1,413 women with incident breast cancer diagnosed in 1996-1997, and 1,411 age-matched women without breast cancer. Date and cause of death through December 31, 2009 were assessed through the national death index and covariate data was gathered through structured interviews and medical record abstraction. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Cox regression for overall mortality (HR) and CVD-specific death (cause-specific HR). Subdistribution HRs for CVD death were estimated from the Fine-Gray model. RESULTS: Risk of death was greater among breast cancer survivors compared with women without breast cancer (HR: 1.8 [1.5, 2.1]). An increase in CVD-related death among breast cancer survivors was evident only 7 years after diagnosis (years 0-7, cause-specific HR: 0.80 [0.53, 1.2], subdistribution HR: 0.59 [0.40, 0.87]); years 7+, cause-specific HR: 1.8 [1.3, 2.5], subdistribution HR: 1.9 [1.4, 2.7]; P interaction: 0.001). An increase in CVD-related mortality was observed among breast cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors are at greater risk for CVD-related mortality compared with women without breast cancer and this increase in risk is manifested approximately 7 years after diagnosis. Efforts should be made to identify risk factors and interventions that can be employed during this brief window to reduce the excess burden of CVD in this vulnerable population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0000000000000394

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Bradshaw, P. T., Stevens, J., Khankari, N., Teitelbaum, S. L., Neugut, A. I., & Gammon, M. D.
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2016-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
6-13
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2413293160
Cited by
443
References
6
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.