Cited by 89COVID-19 epidemiological studiesStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Estimating the Unknown: Greater Racial and Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Burden After Accounting for Missing Race and Ethnicity Data

Open access
Labgold, Katie, Hamid, Sarah, Shah, Sarita, Gandhi, Neel R., Chamberlain, Allison, Khan, Fazle, Khan, Shamimul, Smith, Sasha +3 more·2021·Epidemiology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous persons in the United States have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and death from COVID-19, due to persistent social inequities. However, the magnitude of the disparity is unclear because race/ethnicity information is often missing in surveillance data. Methods: We quantified the burden of SARS-CoV-2 notification, hospitalization, and case fatality rates in an urban county by racial/ethnic group using combined race/ethnicity imputation and quantitative bias analysis for misclassification. Results: The ratio of the absolute racial/ethnic disparity in notification rates after bias adjustment, compared with the complete case analysis, increased 1.3-fold for persons classified Black and 1.6-fold for those classified Hispanic, in reference to classified White persons. Conclusions: These results highlight that complete case analyses may underestimate absolute disparities in notification rates. Complete reporting of race/ethnicity information is necessary for health equity. When data are missing, quantitative bias analysis methods may improve estimates of racial/ethnic disparities in the COVID-19 burden.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0000000000001314

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Panter M Case Reports: Terminology and Phrasing. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1969)039<0246:CR>2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Labgold, K., Hamid, S., Shah, S., Gandhi, N. R., Chamberlain, A., Khan, F., Khan, S., Smith, S., Williams, S., Lash, T. L., & Collin, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Georgia Department of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Collin, Lindsay J.
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2020-11-30
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
157-161
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111489730
Cited by
89
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation
  • Robert W. Woodruff Foundation
  • Georgia Department of Public Health
  • National Institutes of Health (TL1TR002540)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (UM1HL134590)
  • National Cancer Institute (F31CA239566)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K24AI114444)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM013049)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, racial and ethnic disparities, missing data imputation, misclassification bias, notification rates, hospitalization, case fatality rate, health equity, Black and Hispanic populations, indigenous peoples, urban counties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review