Cited by 63Medical Coding and Health InformationRace, Genetics, and SocietyData Quality and Management

Using the Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding Method (BISG) to Create a Working Classification of Race and Ethnicity in a Diverse Managed Care Population: A Validation Study

Open access
Adjaye‐Gbewonyo, Dzifa, Bednarczyk, Robert A., Davis, Robert L., Omer, Saad B.·2014·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective: To validate classification of race/ethnicity based on the Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding method (BISG) and assess variations in validity by gender and age. Data Sources/Study Setting: Secondary data on members of K aiser P ermanente G eorgia, an integrated managed care organization, through 2010. Study Design: For 191,494 members with self‐reported race/ethnicity, probabilities for belonging to each of six race/ethnicity categories predicted from the BISG algorithm were used to assign individuals to a race/ethnicity category over a range of cutoffs greater than a probability of 0.50. Overall as well as gender‐ and age‐stratified sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and used to identify optimal cutoffs for race/ethnicity assignment. Principal Findings: The overall cutoffs for assignment that optimized sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.50 to 0.57 for the four main racial/ethnic categories (White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic). Corresponding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV ranged from 64.4 to 81.4 percent, 80.8 to 99.7 percent, 75.0 to 91.6 percent, and 79.4 to 98.0 percent, respectively. Accuracy of assignment was better among males and individuals of 65 years or older. Conclusions: BISG may be useful for classifying race/ethnicity of health plan members when needed for health care studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6773.12089

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adjaye‐Gbewonyo, D., Bednarczyk, R. A., Davis, R. L., & Omer, S. B.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Adjaye‐Gbewonyo, Dzifa
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-16
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
268-283
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2025824923
Cited by
63
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kaiser Permanente
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
Keywords
racial and ethnic classification, classification validity, sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, gender differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Birth Certificates, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Managed Care Programs, Middle Aged, Names, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review