Cited by 70Human-Animal Interaction StudiesBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiac Health and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pet Ownership and Blood Pressure in Old Age

Abstract

Background It has been proposed that pet ownership improves cardiovascular health. This study examines the relation of pet ownership with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, and hypertension in a large sample of older men and women. Methods Participants were 1179 community-dwelling men (n = 498) and women (n = 681) age 50-95 years. Participants responded to a 1991-1992 mailed questionnaire ascertaining pet ownership, and they attended a 1992-1996 clinic visit at which systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures were measured and use of antihypertensive medication was validated. Pulse pressure was calculated as SBP minus DBP. Mean arterial pressure was calculated as (SBP+DBP)/2. Body mass index, waist-hip ratio, and information on other potential confounders were obtained. Results Average age of participants was 70.4 +/- 10.8 years; 30.0% reported current pet ownership. Mean SBP was 137.5 +/- 21.4 mm Hg, and DBP was 76.1 +/- 9.3 mm Hg; 55.6% were hypertensive (SBP >or= 140, DBP >or= 90 or taking hypertension medication). Pet owners were younger and slightly more overweight and they exercised less than nonowners; owners were somewhat more likely to have diabetes and to use beta-blockers. In unadjusted analyses, pet owners had lower SBP, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure, and a reduced risk of hypertension (odds ratio = 0.62; 95% confidence interval = 0.49-0.80). However, after adjustment for age and other confounders, p…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0b013e3181271398

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a survey of 1179 elderly persons (mean age 70), pet owners had comparatively reduced systolic mean arteriolar and pulse pressure, and lesser risk of hypertension (O.R. = 0.62).

    “In another survey of 1179 elderly persons (mean age 70), pet owners had comparatively reduced systolic mean arteriolar and pulse pressure, and lesser risk of hypertension (O.R. = 0.62) [39].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Allen, 2001, Pet ownership, but not ACE inhibitor therapy, blunts home BP responses to mental stress., Hypertension, 38, 815, 10.1161/hyp.38.4.815 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Parslow, 2003, Pet ownership and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: another look., Med J Aust, 179, 466, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05649.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Nagengast, 1997, The effects of the presence of a companion animal on physiological arousal and behavioral distress in children during a physical examination., J Pediatr Nurs, 12, 323, 10.1016/S0882-5963(97)80058-9 · DOI
  4. Eddy, 1996, RM and Beaux: reductions in cardiac activity in response to a pet snake., J Nerv Ment Dis, 184, 573, 10.1097/00005053-199609000-00010 · DOI
  5. Alonso, 1999, Cardiovascular responses to a pet snake., J Nerv Ment Dis, 187, 311, 10.1097/00005053-199905000-00009 · DOI
  6. Headey, 2003, Pet ownership: good for health (Editorial)?, Med J Aust, 179, 460, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05646.x · DOI
  7. Nair, 2004, Pet owners and risk factors in cardiovascular disease (Letter)., Med J Aust, 180, 144, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05848.x · DOI
  8. Curb, 1983, A coordinating center in a clinical trial: the Hypertension Detection and Followup Program., Control Clin Trials, 4, 171, 10.1016/0197-2456(83)90001-6 · DOI
  9. Kingwell, 2001, Presence of a pet dog and human cardiovascular responses to mild mental stress., Clin Auton Res, 11, 313, 10.1007/BF02332977 · DOI
  10. Grundy, 1999, Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology., Circulation, 100, 1481, 10.1161/01.CIR.100.13.1481 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hahn, 1998, Cardiovascular disease risk factors and preventive practices among adults – United States, 1994: a behavioral risk factor atlas. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System State Coordinators., MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, 47, 35
  12. Barrett-Connor, 1980, The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an adult community as determined by history or fasting hyperglycemia., Am J Epidemiol, 111, 705, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112948 · DOI
  13. Holdbrook, 1981, Cigarette smoking cessation in an upper middle class population., J Cardiac Rehab, 1, 122
  14. Jones, 1982, A community study of calorie and nutrient intake in drinkers and nondrinkers of alcohol., Am J Clin Nutr, 35, 135, 10.1093/ajcn/35.1.135 · DOI
  15. Barrett-Connor, 1981, Diabetes and hypertension in a community of older adults., Am J Epidemiol, 113, 276, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113097 · DOI
  16. Harris, 1989, Impaired glucose tolerance in the U.S. population., Diabetes Care, 12, 464, 10.2337/diacare.12.7.464 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wingard, 1990, Community-based study of prevalence of NIDDM in older adults., Diabetes Care, 13, 3, 10.2337/diacare.13.2.S3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wright, J. D., Kritz-Silverstein, D., Morton, D. J., Wingard, D. L., & Barrett-Connor, E.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wright, Joel David
  • Morton, Deborah J.
  • Wingard, Deborah L.
  • Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2007-09
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
613-618
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022923995
Cited by
70
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG02181)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK031801)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
pet ownership, blood pressure, hypertension, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, older adults, cardiovascular health, vascular reactivity, antihypertensive drugs, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Human-Animal Bond, California, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review