The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vitamin D Supplementation and Reduced Risk of Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A recent study showed that nulliparous women who develop preeclampsia had low concentrations of vitamin D in serum sampled in midpregnancy. The aim of the present study was to estimate the association between intake of vitamin D during pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia in 23,423 nulliparous pregnant women taking part in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. METHODS: Participating women answered questionnaires at gestational week 15 (general health questionnaire), at week 22 (food frequency questionnaire), and at week 30 (general health questionnaire). Pregnancy outcomes were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry. Nutrient intake was calculated from foods and dietary supplements. We estimated relative risks as odds ratios, and controlled for confounding with multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The odds ratio of preeclampsia for women with a total vitamin D intake of 15-20 microg/d compared with less than 5 microg/d was 0.76 (95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.95). Considering only the intake of vitamin D from supplements, we found a 27% reduction in risk of preeclampsia (OR = 0.73 [0.58-0.92]) for women taking 10-15 microg/d as compared with no supplements. No association was found between intake of vitamin D from the diet alone and the occurrence of preeclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with other reports of a protective effect of vitamin D on preeclampsia development. However, because vitamin D intake is highly correlated with the intake of long chain n-3 fatty acids in the Norwegian diet, further research is needed to disentangle the separate effects of these nutrients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maternal Mineral and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Post-Weaning Recovery
Kovacs, C. S. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2015 · Cited by 544
Vitamin D: In the evolution of human skin colour
Yuen, A. W. C., & Jablonski, N. G. (2010) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.08.007 · Cited by 99
Vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy – still a public health issue
McAree, T., Jacobs, B., Manickavasagar, T., Velagala, S., Brennan, L., Bassett, P., Rainbow, S., & Blair, M. (2013) · Maternal & Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.12014 · Cited by 79
Vitamin D status during normal pregnancy and postpartum. A longitudinal study in 141 Danish women
Milman, N., Hvas, A.-M., & Bergholt, T. (2012) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm.2011.120 · Cited by 51
Zhao, R., Zhou, L., Wang, S., Xiong, G., & Hao, L. (2022) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/d1fo03033g · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Haugen, M., Brantsæter, A. L., Trogstad, L., Alexander, J., Roth, C., Magnus, P., & Meltzer, H. M.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 720-726
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049740593
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vitamin D Supplementation and Reduced Risk of Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181a70f08
- The paper
- Haugen, M., Brantsæter, A. L., Trogstad, L., Alexander, J., Roth, C., Magnus, P., & Meltzer, H. M. (2009). Vitamin D Supplementation and Reduced Risk of Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women. Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181a70f08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.