Cited by 160Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesAnesthesia and Pain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The LAS VEGAS risk score for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications: An observational study

Open access
Neto, Ary Serpa, da Costa, Luiz Guilherme V., Hemmes, Sabrine N.T., Canet, Jaume, Hedenstierna, Göran, Jaber, Samir, Hiesmayr, Michael, Hollmann, Markus W., Mills, Gary H., Vidal Melo, Marcos F., Pearse, Rupert, Putensen, Christian, Schmid, Werner, Severgnini, Paolo, Wrigge, Hermann, Gama de Abreu, Marcelo, Pelosi, Paolo, Schultz, Marcus J.·2018·European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently used pre-operative prediction scores for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) use patient data and expected surgery characteristics exclusively. However, intra-operative events are also associated with the development of PPCs. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a new prediction score for PPCs that uses both pre-operative and intra-operative data. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of the LAS VEGAS study, a large international, multicentre, prospective study. SETTINGS: A total of 146 hospitals across 29 countries. PATIENTS: Adult patients requiring intra-operative ventilation during general anaesthesia for surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The cohort was randomly divided into a development subsample to construct a predictive model, and a subsample for validation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction performance of developed models for PPCs. RESULTS: Of the 6063 patients analysed, 10.9% developed at least one PPC. Regression modelling identified 13 independent risk factors for PPCs: six patient characteristics [higher age, higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical score, pre-operative anaemia, pre-operative lower SpO2 and a history of active cancer or obstructive sleep apnoea], two procedure-related features (urgent or emergency surgery and surgery lasting ≥ 1 h), and five intra-operative events [use of an airway other than a supraglottic device, the use of intravenous anaesthetic agents along with volatile agents (balanced anaesthesia), intra-operative desaturation, higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressures > 3 cmH2O and use of vasopressors]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the LAS VEGAS risk score for prediction of PPCs was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.76 to 0.80] for the development subsample and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.76) for the validation subsample. CONCLUSION: The LAS VEGAS risk score including 13 peri-operative characteristics has a moderate discriminative ability for prediction of PPCs. External validation is needed before use in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01601223.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/eja.0000000000000845

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Neto, A. S., da Costa, L. G. V., Hemmes, S. N. T., Canet, J., Hedenstierna, G., Jaber, S., Hiesmayr, M., Hollmann, M. W., Mills, G. H., Vidal Melo, M. F., Pearse, R., Putensen, C., Schmid, W., Severgnini, P., Wrigge, H., Gama de Abreu, M., Pelosi, P., & Schultz, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Neto, Ary Serpa
Venue
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
Published
2018-09
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
691-701
ISSN
0265-0215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809430993
Cited by
160
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Anaesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP_2014-04-022)
  • Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Università degli Studi di Genova
  • Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
  • Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Albert Einstein
  • Haukeland Universitetssjukehus
  • Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet
  • European Society of Anaesthesiology
  • Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas
  • Barts Health NHS Trust
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL121228, R34HL123438)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
postoperative pulmonary complications, risk scoring, general anesthesia, risk factors, positive end-expiratory pressure, vasopressors, supraglottic airway devices, balanced anesthesia, preoperative anemia, obstructive sleep apnea, emergency surgery
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Female, Health Status, Humans, Intraoperative Period, Lung, Lung Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Preoperative Period, Operative Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review