Cited by 32Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismSchizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Depot Haloperidol Treatment in Outpatients With Schizophrenia on Monotherapy: Impact of CYP2D6 Polymorphism on Pharmacokinetics and Treatment Outcome

Panagiotidis, Georgios, Arthur, Holger W, Lindh, Jonatan D, Dahl, Marja-Liisa, Sjöqvist, Folke·2007·Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Abstract

Haloperidol and several other antipsychotic drugs are at least partially metabolized by the polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). The interindividual variation in metabolic capacity of CYP2D6 might be of importance when dosing. In this study, 26 outpatients with schizophrenia and depot haloperidol as monotherapy were genotyped. The authors found 1 patient with no functional alleles, 8 with one functional allele, 16 with two functional alleles, and 1 with three functional alleles. The daily dose of haloperidol ranged from 0.45 to 14.29 mg. Steady state plasma concentrations were measured at peak (range, 1.6-67 nmol/L) and at trough (range, 1.0-49 nmol/L). The Positive and Negative Syndrome scale for Schizophrenia and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale were used to evaluate the clinical effect. The authors found a clear correlation between haloperidol plasma concentration and number of active CYP2D6 alleles. No correlation was found between plasma concentration of haloperidol or number of CYP2D6 alleles and treatment outcome or side effects. A model to predict plasma concentration from dose and number of active CYP2D6 alleles was formed from the obtained data by means of multiple linear regression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ftd.0b013e31811f394d

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panagiotidis, G., Arthur, H. W., Lindh, J. D., Dahl, M.-L., & Sjöqvist, F.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Panagiotidis, Georgios
  • Lindh, Jonatan D
  • Sjöqvist, Folke
Venue
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Published
2007-08
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
417-422
ISSN
0163-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002894637
Cited by
32
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
haloperidol, schizophrenia, CYP2D6 polymorphism, pharmacokinetics, genotype-phenotype correlation, plasma concentration, antipsychotic monotherapy, extrapyramidal symptoms, treatment outcomes, dose prediction model, drug metabolism
MeSH terms
Adult, Alleles, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Genotype, Haloperidol, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Polymorphism, Genetic, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review