Cited by 154Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsSexual function and dysfunction studies

Surgical versus natural menopause: cognitive issues

Henderson, Victor W., Sherwin, Barbara B.·2007·Menopause

Abstract

Objective Women who undergo both natural and surgical menopause experience the loss of cyclic ovarian production of estrogen, but hormonal and demographic differences distinguish these two groups of women. Our objective was to review published evidence on whether the premature cessation of endogenous estrogen production in women who underwent a surgical menopause has deleterious consequences for cognitive aging and to determine whether consequences differ for women if they undergo natural menopause. Studies of estrogen-containing hormone therapy are relevant to this issue. Design We reviewed evidence-based research, including the systematic identification of randomized clinical trials of hormone therapy with cognitive outcomes that included an objective measure of episodic memory. Results As inferred from very small, short-term, randomized, controlled trials of high-dose estrogen treatment, surgical menopause may be accompanied by cognitive impairment that primarily affects verbal episodic memory. Observational evidence suggests that the natural menopausal transition is not accompanied by substantial changes in cognitive abilities. For initiation of hormone therapy during perimenopause or early postmenopause when the ovaries are intact, limited clinical trial data provide no consistent evidence of short-term benefit or harm. There is stronger clinical trial evidence that initiation of hormone therapy in late postmenopause does not benefit episodic memory or other cognitive sk…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/gme.0b013e31803df49c

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henderson, V. W., & Sherwin, B. B.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Henderson, Victor W.
Venue
Menopause
Published
2007-05
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
572-579
ISSN
1072-3714 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016117684
Cited by
154
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
surgical menopause, natural menopause, estrogen deficiency, hormone therapy, cognitive aging, episodic memory, verbal memory, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, perimenopause, postmenopause, timing of hormone therapy initiation
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Menopause, Ovariectomy, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review