The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are We Witnessing a Paradigm Shift?: A Systematic Review of Social Media in Residency
Open accessAbstract
Background: As social media’s applications continue to evolve, the pitfalls and dangers associated with misuse have been accentuated in the literature. Consequently, academic institutions across the nation have implemented social media policies. This study is aimed to evaluate the state of social media literature examining postgraduate trainees (residents/fellows). Methods: A systematic search was performed identifying peer-reviewed publications presenting original research. Studies published through December 8, 2018, focusing on social media use among postgraduate trainees were considered for inclusion. Results: Fifty-three studies were categorized into 4 domains: (1) resident recruitment, (2) graduate medical education, (3) professional development, and (4) academic scholarship. Thirty-four (64.15%) investigated social media’s impact on professional development, of which 16 (47.05%) highlighted the detrimental potential on trainee professionalism. The remaining 18 (52.94%) focused on promoting social media training during residency, and/or enhancing social media competency to benefit professional development. Fourteen (26.42%) rationalized social media use in augmenting graduate medical education. Ten (18.87%) assessed social media’s influence on resident recruitment, of which 7 (70%) depicted use as a screening instrument for program directors on resident applicants. Two (3.77%) of the studies introduced social media as a platform for academic scholarship with indicators as altmetrics. Conclusions: The well-established disadvantages of social media use by the postgraduate trainee continue to persist in the literature. However, there is recognition of social media as a valuable resource in influencing resident recruitment, graduate medical education, professional development, and academic scholarship, representing a paradigm shift—from cautiously avoidant to thoughtful capitalization on its immense potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Economides et al’s [184] review depicts evolving perceptions and a paradigm shift, where a growing body of literature is now focusing on promoting responsible SM use, examining how SM training can enhance professional growth and academic scholarship.”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [184]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similar conclusions were made in a systematic review of SM in residency [184].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [184]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · Cited by 42,509
Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature
Alalwan, A. A., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Algharabat, R. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.008 · Cited by 1,126
Cook, D. A., & Reed, D. A. (2015) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000786 · Cited by 781
Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in Medicine and Health Care
Grajales III, F. J., Sheps, S., Ho, K., Novak-Lauscher, H., & Eysenbach, G. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2912 · Cited by 737
The Intersection of Online Social Networking with Medical Professionalism
Thompson, L. A., Dawson, K., Ferdig, R., Black, E. W., Boyer, J., Coutts, J., & Black, N. P. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0538-8 · Cited by 425
A general critical appraisal tool: An evaluation of construct validity
Crowe, M. J., & Sheppard, L. A. (2011) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.06.004 · Cited by 210
Greysen, S. R., Chretien, K. C., Kind, T., Young, A., & Gross, C. P. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.330 · Cited by 158
Branford, O. A., Kamali, P., Rohrich, R. J., et al. (2016) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002814 · Cited by 154
Shore, R., Halsey, J., Shah, K., Crigger, B.-J., & Douglas, S. P. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce201122208 · Cited by 149
Use of social media in urology: data from the A merican U rological A ssociation ( AUA )
Loeb, S., Bayne, C. E., Frey, C., Davies, B., Averch, T. D., Woo, H. H., Stork, B., Cooperberg, M. R., & Eggener, S. E. (2013) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.12586 · Cited by 143
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vukušić Rukavina, T., Viskić, J., Machala Poplašen, L., Relić, D., Marelić, M., Jokic, D., & Sedak, K. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25770 · Cited by 199
“Economides et al’s [184] review depicts evolving perceptions and a paradigm shift, where a growing body of literature is now focusing on promoting responsible SM use, examining how SM training can enhance professional growth and academic scholarship.”
Perception of social media behaviour among medical students, residents and medical specialists
Pronk, S. A., Gorter, S. L., Van Luijk, S. J., Barnhoorn, P. C., Binkhorst, B., & Van Mook, W. N. K. A. V. M. (2021) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.1007/s40037-021-00660-1 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Economides, J. M., Choi, Y. K., Fan, K. L., Kanuri, A. P., & Song, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Economides, James M.
- Fan, Kenneth L.
- Kanuri, Arjun P.
- Song, David H.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e2288
- ISSN
- 2169-7574 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6756642
- OpenAlex
- W2969853444
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- social media, medical residents, graduate medical education, professional development, residency recruitment, social media policy, professionalism, social media training, altmetrics, academic scholarship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review