CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Workplace Health and Well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

To rate or not to rate? Autonomic response and psychological well-being of employees during performance review.

Balconi, Michela, Venturella, Irene, Fronda, Giulia, de Filippis, Daniela, Salati, Emanuela, Vanutelli, Maria Elide·2019·The Health Care Manager
DOI 10.1097/hcm.0000000000000257
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Organizational research started including neurosciences exploring pivotal phenomena and promoting organizational well-being. Leadership was investigated by assessing psychophysiological responses during performance review characterized by narrative or quantitative assessments and their effects on employees' well-being. As is known, rating could be perceived as threatening for employees' ranking and status perception, leading to avoidant behaviors. DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY: Here, manager-employee dyads were assigned to 2 conditions: in the nonrate scenario, managers were asked to describe the employee's performance; in the rate one, they had to provide a quantitative rating. Skin conductance level and response and heart rate indices were continuously recorded. FINDINGS: Dyads in nonrate condition showed higher arousal-related responses (skin conductance level and skin conductance response), perhaps highlighting an increased engagement triggered by a rewarding exchange. Conversely, in rate condition, employees showed higher heart rate, usually related to negative and stressful conditions, and avoidant behaviors. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Results are discussed for their possible applications to employees' well-being.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hcm.0000000000000257

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2010, Turn the 360 around, Neuroleadersh J, 3, 78
  2. 2008, SCARF: a brain-based model for collaborating with and influencing others, Neuroleadersh J, 1, 44
  3. 2008, The pains and pleasures of social life: a social cognitive neuroscience approach, Neuroleadersh J, 1, 38

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Balconi, M., Venturella, I., Fronda, G., de Filippis, D., Salati, E., & Vanutelli, M. E.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Balconi, Michela
ORCID
Venue
The Health Care Manager
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2019-04
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
179-186
ISSN
  • 1525-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-512X
DOI
10.1097/hcm.0000000000000257
OpenAlex
W2934539694
Cited by
15
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Health Care Manager (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
performance evaluation (human resources), performance ratings, autonomic responses, psychological well-being, skin conductance, heart rate, stress, avoidance behavior, psychophysiology, employee engagement, status threat
MeSH terms
Adult, Employee Performance Appraisal, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review