Cited by 218Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringClinical practice guidelines implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recommendations and Practical Guidance for performing and reporting validation studies according to the Universal Standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO)

Open access
Stergiou, George S., Palatini, Paolo, Asmar, Roland, Ioannidis, John P., Kollias, Anastasios, Lacy, Peter, McManus, Richard J., Myers, Martin G., Parati, Gianfranco, Shennan, Andrew, Wang, Jiguang, O’Brien, Eoin·2019·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

: In the past 30 years, several organizations have developed protocols for clinical validation of blood pressure measuring devices. An international initiative was recently launched by the US Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring (ESH) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), aiming to reach consensus on a universal AAMI/ESH/ISO validation standard. The purpose of this statement by the ESH Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring is to provide practical guidance for investigators performing validation studies according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018), to ensure that its stipulations are meticulously implemented and data are fully reported. Thus, this statement provides: a list of key recommendations for validation studies of intermittent non-invasive automated blood pressure measuring devices according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard; practical stepwise guidance for researchers performing these validation studies; a checklist for authors and reviewers of such studies; an example of a complete validation study report.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002039

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. O’Brien, 1993, The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices, J Hypertens, 11, S43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Stergiou, G. S., Palatini, P., Asmar, R., Ioannidis, J. P., Kollias, A., Lacy, P., McManus, R. J., Myers, M. G., Parati, G., Shennan, A., Wang, J., & O’Brien, E.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Stergiou, George S.
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2019-03
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
459-466
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904099490
Cited by
218
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 6
FWCI
16.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR200201, NIHR-RP-02-12-015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
blood pressure measuring devices, device validation, ISO 81060-2:2018, automated blood pressure monitoring, reporting checklist
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Societies, Medical, Consensus, Validation Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review