Cited by 178Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years and older: the lower the better? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Bejan-Angoulvant, Theodora, Saadatian-Elahi, Mitra, Wright, James M, Schron, Eleanor B, Lindholm, Lars H, Fagard, Robert, Staessen, Jan A, Gueyffier, François·2010·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results of randomized controlled trials are consistent in showing reduced rates of stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular events in very old patients treated with antihypertensive drugs. However, inconsistencies exist with regard to the effect of these drugs on total mortality. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of available data on hypertensive patients 80 years and older by selecting total mortality as the main outcome. Secondary outcomes were coronary events, stroke, cardiovascular events, heart failure and cause-specific mortality. The common relative risk (RR) of active treatment versus placebo or no treatment was assessed using a random-effect model. Linear meta-regression was performed to explore the relationship between intensity of antihypertensive therapy and blood pressure (BP) reduction and the log-transformed value of total mortality odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: The overall RR for total mortality was 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.89-1.25), with significant heterogeneity between hypertension in the very elderly trial (HYVET) and the other trials. This heterogeneity was not explained by differences in the follow-up duration between trials. The meta-regression suggested that a reduction in mortality was achieved in trials with the least BP reductions and the lowest intensity of therapy. Antihypertensive therapy significantly reduced (P < 0.001) the risk of stroke (35%), cardiovascular events (27%) and heart failure (50%). Cause-specific mortality was not different between treated and untreated patients. CONCLUSION: Treating hypertension in very old patients reduces stroke and heart failure with no effect on total mortality. The most reasonable strategy is the one associated with significant mortality reduction; thiazides as first-line drugs with a maximum of two drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0b013e328339f9c5

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Copyright @ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. 14 17 1372 lournal of Hypertension 201 0, Vol 28 No 7
  2. Amery A, Birkenháger W, Brixko P, Bulpitt C, Clement D, Deruytlere M, et a/. l\4ortality and morbidity results from the European Working Parly on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly lnal. Lancet 1 985; 1:1 349-1354.
  3. 1l le Copyright @ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bejan-Angoulvant, T., Saadatian-Elahi, M., Wright, J. M., Schron, E. B., Lindholm, L. H., Fagard, R., Staessen, J. A., & Gueyffier, F.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2010-07
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
1366-1372
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020362859
Cited by
178
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 22
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Société Française d’Hypertension Artérielle
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
hypertension, very elderly patients, antihypertensive therapy, blood pressure reduction, all-cause mortality, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular events, cause-specific mortality, thiazide diuretics, treatment intensity, HYVET trial
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Placebos, Treatment Outcome, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review