Cited by 12Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseSports Performance and Training

A valid and reproducible protocol for testing maximal oxygen uptake in rabbits

Gaustad, Svein Erik, Rolim, Natale, Wisløff, Ulrik·2010·European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physiological studies of long-term cardiovascular adaptation to exercise require adequate testing procedures to quantify the outcome. Such test procedures are well established in rats and mice. However, the use of these species may have limitations, and to study several physiological parameters mimicking 'the human adaptation' larger animal models may be preferable. Here, we established a valid and reproducible exercise test protocol for measuring maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in rabbits. METHODS AND RESULTS: The VO2max protocol was studied in six adult female New Zealand White rabbits running on a treadmill at inclinations ranging from 0 to 20 degrees. VO2max was reached at all inclinations indicating that the rabbits reach exhaustion independent of inclination. Average VO2max for test and retest were 35.1+/-4.2 and 35.8+/-4.0 ml/kg per min, respectively. Oxygen uptake and heart rate increased linearly with increased running speed. Average running speed at VO2max was 0.51+/-0.09 m/s, and there was an increase oxygen pulse up to the intensity corresponding to VO2max, where it leveled off and declined. CONCLUSION: This study shows that rabbit is a suitable species for studying responses to training and could be of great importance for showing novel cellular cardiac adaptations to training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjr.0b013e32833090c4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rabbit in vivo heart rate range is 155-360 bpm, higher than humans but closer to humans than mouse and rat heart rates.

    “Rabbits have an in vivo heart rate range of 155–360 bpm (Gaustad, Rolim, & Wisloff, 2010; Jover, McGrath, & Ludbrook, 1987) which is still higher than humans (Flamm, et al., 1990; Stratton, et al., 1994) but significantly closer than mouse and rats”
  • During peak exercise, rabbits can increase heart rate from 155-211 bpm to 328-360 bpm, a 71-112% increase.

    “Exercise studies suggest that rabbits can increase their heart rates from 155–211 bpm to 328–360 bpm (71–112% increase) during peak exercise (Gaustad, et al., 2010; Jover, et al., 1987).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaustad, S. E., Rolim, N., & Wisløff, U.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Wisløff, Ulrik
Venue
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation
Published
2010-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
83-88
ISSN
1741-8267 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022234288
Cited by
12
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
VO2max, rabbit model, treadmill exercise testing, test-retest reproducibility, training effects, cardiovascular adaptation to exercise, heart rate, oxygen pulse, running speed, treadmill inclination
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Electrocardiography, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Female, Heart Rate, Oxygen, Oxygen Consumption, Rabbits, Telemetry, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Observer Variation, Respiratory Mechanics, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review