Cited by 14Radioactivity and Radon MeasurementsRadioactive contamination and transferRadiation Effects and Dosimetry

Radiochemical characterization of algae products commercialized for human consumption

Desideri, Donatella, Cantaluppi, Chiara, Ceccotto, Federica, Meli, Maria Assunta, Roselli, Carla, Feduzi, Laura·2016·Health Physics

Abstract

Natural radionuclides and Cs were determined by alpha (U, U, Th,Po,Th, and Th) and gamma spectrometry (Cs, K, Ra, Pb, and Ra via Ac) in 14 dried seaweeds commercialized for human nutrition in Italy. The study was carried out in order to provide information on the concentrations of natural and artificial radionuclides. Cesium-137 (Cs) concentrations in all analyzed samples were always <2.0 Bq kg (dry weight), while the naturally occurring radionuclide concentrations were detectable in all the samples and significantly different in the analyzed seaweeds. Potassium-40 (K) showed a mean activity of 894 Bq kg with a range of 14.1-3,256 Bq kg. The mean of activity for Po was 5.1 Bq kg with a range of 1.5-13.6 Bq kg. The mean of activity for Pb was 8.9 Bq kg with a range of 2.9-25.7 Bq kg. The mean of U and Ra activity concentration was 4.7 and 8.4 Bq kg with a range of 0.1-27.7 and 3.2-24.6 Bq kg, respectively. The mean activity concentrations for Th, Th, and Ra were 0.69, 3.0, and 6.6 Bq kg with ranges of 0.05-3.39, 0.24-15.7, and 0.5-35.6 Bq kg, respectively. Radionuclide activity concentrations were within ranges reported in the scientific literature. The committed effective dose due to all the radionuclides analyzed, from ingestion of 1 kg y of seaweeds, accounts for 0.66% of the natural radiation exposure in Italy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hp.0000000000000526

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desideri, D., Cantaluppi, C., Ceccotto, F., Meli, M. A., Roselli, C., & Feduzi, L.
Affiliations
University of Urbino (IT)
Corresponding author
Desideri, Donatella
Venue
Health Physics
Published
2016-09
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
256-264
ISSN
0017-9078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2517596797
Cited by
14
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research information system (University of Urbino) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Radioactive contamination and transfer
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
Keywords
seaweed, natural radionuclides, cesium-137, potassium-40, radium-224, radium-226, uranium, thorium, polonium-210, lead-210, committed effective dose, dietary radiation exposure, food contamination
MeSH terms
Radiation Exposure, Food Analysis, Food Contamination, Radioactive, Humans, Italy, Radiation Dosage, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Seaweed, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review