Cited by 56Effects of Radiation ExposureNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsRadiation Dose and Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ability of Filgrastim to Mitigate Mortality Following LD50/60 Total-body Irradiation Is Administration Time-Dependent

Open access

Abstract

The identification of the optimal administration schedule for an effective medical countermeasure is critical for the effective treatment of individuals exposed to potentially lethal doses of radiation. The efficacy of filgrastim (Neupogen®), a potential medical countermeasure, to improve survival when initiated at 48 h following total body irradiation in a non-human primate model of the hematopoietic syndrome of the acute radiation syndrome was investigated. Animals were exposed to total body irradiation, antero-posterior exposure, total midline tissue dose of 7.5 Gy, (target lethal dose 50/60) delivered at 0.80 Gy min, using linear accelerator-derived 6 MV photons. All animals were administered medical management. Following irradiation on day 0, filgrastim (10 μg kg d) or the control (5% dextrose in water) was administered subcutaneously daily through effect (absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,000 cells μL for three consecutive days). The study (n = 80) was powered to demonstrate a 25% improvement in survival following the administration of filgrastim or control beginning at 48 ± 4 h post-irradiation. Survival analysis was conducted on the intention-to-treat population using a two-tailed null hypothesis at a 5% significance level. Filgrastim, initiated 48 h after irradiation, did not improve survival (2.5% increase, p = 0.8230). These data demonstrate that efficacy of a countermeasure to mitigate lethality in the hematopoietic syndrome of the acute radiation syndrome can be dependent on the interval between irradiation and administration of the medical countermeasure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hp.0b013e3182a4dd2c

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subsequent studies have shown a loss in Neupogen effectiveness when treatment initiation was extended to 48 hours post-exposure (e.g., 2.5% increase, p = 0.8230).

    “Subsequent studies have shown a loss in effectiveness when treatment initiation was extended to 48-h post-exposure (e.g., 2.5% increase, p = 08,230) (Farese et al., 2014) as well as in the absence of whole blood transfusions (31% versus 36% survival in the Neupogen® versus control arms, respectively) (Gluzman-Poltorak et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Baltschukat, 1990, Hematological effects of unilateral and bilateral exposures of dogs to 300-kVp x-rays., Radiat Res, 123, 7, 10.2307/3577651 · DOI
  2. Baranov, 1994, Hematopoietic recovery after 10-Gy acute total body radiation., Blood, 83, 596, 10.1182/blood.V83.2.596.596 · DOI
  3. Bertho, 2005, Comparison of autologous cell therapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) injection vs G-CSF alone for the treatment of acute radiation syndrome in a nonhuman primate model., Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 63, 911, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.045 · DOI
  4. Bertho, 2005, Application of autologous hematopoietic cell therapy to a nonhuman primate model of heterogeneous high-dose irradiation., Radiat Res, 163, 557, 10.1667/RR3352 · DOI
  5. Butturini, 1988, Use of recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor in the Brazil radiation accident., The Lancet, 332, 471, 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90121-3 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chatta, 1994, Effects of in vivo recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony stimulating factor on the neutrophil response and peripheral blood colony forming cells in healthy young and elderly adult volunteers., Blood, 84, 2923, 10.1182/blood.V84.9.2923.2923 · DOI
  7. Davis, 1994, Data monitoring in clinical trials: the case for stochastic curtailment., J Clin Epidemiol, 47, 1033, 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90119-8 · DOI
  8. Drouet, 2004, Single administration of stem cell factor, FLT-3 ligand, megakaryocyte growth and development factor, and interleukin-3 in combination soon after irradiation prevents nonhuman primates from myelosupression: long-term follow-up of hematopoiesis., Blood, 103, 878, 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1400 · DOI
  9. Farese, 2012, A nonhuman primate model of the hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome plus medical management., Health Phys, 103, 367, 10.1097/HP.0b013e31825f75a7 · DOI
  10. Farese, 2013, Filgrastim improves survival in lethally irradiated nonhuman primates., Radiat Res, 179, 89, 10.1667/RR3049.1 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gourmelon, 2010, European consensus on the medical management of acute radiation syndrome and analysis of the radiation accidents in Belgium and Senegal., Health Physics, 98, 825, 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181ce64d4 · DOI
  12. Hess, 2002, Functional analysis of human hematopoietic repopulating cells mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone versus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in combination with stem cell factor., Blood, 100, 869, 10.1182/blood.V100.3.869 · DOI
  13. Hirama, 2003, Initial medical management of patients severely irradiated in the Tokai-mura criticality accident., Brit J Radiol, 76, 246, 10.1259/bjr/82373369 · DOI
  14. Liu, 2008, Clinical report of three cases of acute radiation sickness from a 60Co radiation accident in Henan province in China., J Radiat Res, 49, 63, 10.1269/jrr.07071 · DOI
  15. Lord, 1989, The kinetics of human granulopoiesis following treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in vivo., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 86, 9499, 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9499 · DOI
  16. Mackey, 2003, The rate of apoptosis in post mitotic neutrophil precursors of normal and neutropenic humans., Cell Proliferation, 36, 27, 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2003.00251.x · DOI
  17. MacVittie, 2012, The prolonged gastrointestinal syndrome in rhesus macaques: the relationship between gastrointestinal, hematopoietic, and delayed multi-organ sequelae following acute, potentially lethal, partial-body irradiation., Health Phys, 103, 427, 10.1097/HP.0b013e318266eb4c · DOI
  18. MacVittie, 1996, Combination therapy of radiation-induced bone marrow aplasia in nonhuman primates using synthokine SC-55494 and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor., Blood, 87, 4129, 10.1182/blood.V87.10.4129.bloodjournal87104129 · DOI
  19. MacVittie, 2005, Defining the full therapeutic potential of recombinant growth factors in the post radiation-accident environment: the effect of supportive care plus administration of G-CSF., Health Phys, 89, 546, 10.1097/01.HP.0000173143.69659.5b · DOI
  20. Meisenberg, 1992, A comparison of therapeutic schedules for administering granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to nonhuman primates after high-dose chemotherapy., Blood, 79, 2267, 10.1182/blood.V79.9.2267.2267 · DOI
  21. Monroy, 1988, Recovery from severe hemopoietic suppression using recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor., Experimental Hematol, 16, 334
  22. Neelis, 1997, Simultaneous administration of TPO and G-CSF after cytoreductive treatment of rhesus monkeys prevents thrombocytopenia, accelerates platelet and red cell reconstitution, alleviates neutropenia, and promotes the recovery of immature bone marrow cells., Experimental Hematol, 25, 1084
  23. Neelis, 1996, Distinct hematopoietic response patterns to TpoGM-CSF and TpoG-CSF treatment in myelosuppressed rhesus monkeys., Blood, 88, 352a
  24. Nothdurft, 1997, Acceleration of hematopoietic recovery in dogs after extended-field partial-body irradiation by treatment with colony-stimulating factors: rhG-CSF and rhGM-CSF., Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 37, 1145, 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00112-0 · DOI
  25. OBrien, 1979, A multiple testing procedure for clincial trials., Biometrics, 35, 549, 10.2307/2530245 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Patchen, 1993, Effects of combined administration of IL-6 and G-CSF on recovery from radiation-induced hemopoietic aplasia., Experimental Hematol, 21, 338
  27. Patchen, 1990, Therapeutic administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor accelerated hemopoietic regeneration and enhances survival in a murine model of radiation-induced myelosuppression., International J Cell Cloning, 8, 107, 10.1002/stem.5530080204 · DOI
  28. Schuening, 1993, Effects of recombinant canine stem cell factor, a c-kit ligand and recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor on hematopoietic recovery after otherwise lethal total body irradiation., Blood, 81, 20, 10.1182/blood.V81.1.20.20 · DOI
  29. Schuening, 1989, Effect of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on hematopoiesis of normal dogs and on hematopoietic recovery after otherwise lethal total body irradiation., Blood, 74, 1308, 10.1182/blood.V74.4.1308.bloodjournal7441308 · DOI
  30. Storb, 1993, Marrow toxicity of fractionated versus single dose total body irradiation is identical in a canine model., Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 26, 275, 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90207-C · DOI
  31. Tanikawa, 1990, Effects of recombinant human granuloctye colony-stimulating factor on the hematologic recovery and survival of irradiated mice., Blood, 76, 445, 10.1182/blood.V76.3.445.445 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Farese, A. M., Brown, C. R., Smith, C. P., Gibbs, A. M., Katz, B. P., Johnson, C. S., Prado, K. L., & MacVittie, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
  • Farese, Ann M.
  • Brown, Cassandra R.
  • Smith, Cassandra P.
  • Gibbs, Allison M.
  • Prado, Karl L.
  • MacVittie, Thomas J.
Venue
Health Physics
Published
2014-01
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
39-47
ISSN
0017-9078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2327499930
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001108)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201000046C)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
Keywords
filgrastim, total body irradiation, radiation sickness, hematopoietic syndrome, medical countermeasures, administration timing, survival, neutropenia, nonhuman primate model, radiation lethality
MeSH terms
Filgrastim, Animals, Blood Platelets, Erythrocytes, Lethal Dose 50, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neutrophils, Recombinant Proteins, Time Factors, Whole-Body Irradiation, Survival Rate, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review