Cited by 106Retinal and Macular SurgeryIntraocular Surgery and LensesMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Feasibility study of intraocular robotic surgery with the da Vinci surgical system

BOURLA, DAN H., HUBSCHMAN, JEAN PIERRE, CULJAT, MARTIN, TSIRBAS, ANGELO, GUPTA, ANURAG, SCHWARTZ, STEVEN D.·2008·Retina

Abstract

In Brief Purpose: To assess the feasibility of performing intraocular robotic surgery with the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Methods: Using modified robotic instruments, 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, intraocular foreign body removal, and anterior capsulorhexis were performed with the da Vinci system on porcine eyes. We assessed the surgical system’s ability to provide the control, dexterity, maneuverability, and visualization necessary for intraocular surgery. Results: Control of the robotic wristlike instruments allowed for full range of movement. The dexterity of the robotic arms was excellent, with steady instrument motion. Controlling the robotic arms was not as intuitive as moving the wrist. A high stable point of rotation induced motion-related stress at the site of instrument insertion. Visualization of the external operative field during intraocular procedures required camera realignment, and absent retroillumination made anterior segment surgery hard to perform. Conclusions: The da Vinci Surgical System provided adequate dexterity for performing delicate intraocular manipulations. In the current design, the kinematics of the robotic arms was found to be insufficient for standard intraocular surgery. The system’s endoscope did not did not yield the same detail acquired by an ophthalmic microscope. The feasibility of performing intraocular robotic surgery with the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) was assessed. Using modified robotic instruments, 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, intraocular foreign body removal, and anterior capsulorhexis were performed. We found that the da Vinci robot has adequate dexterity to perform delicate intraocular manipulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/iae.0b013e318068de46

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BOURLA, D. H., HUBSCHMAN, J. P., CULJAT, M., TSIRBAS, A., GUPTA, A., & SCHWARTZ, S. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
  • BOURLA, DAN H.
  • HUBSCHMAN, JEAN PIERRE
  • TSIRBAS, ANGELO
  • GUPTA, ANURAG
  • SCHWARTZ, STEVEN D.
Venue
Retina
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
154-158
ISSN
0275-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024793882
Cited by
106
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Retina (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
da Vinci surgical system, pars plana vitrectomy, intraocular foreign body removal, anterior capsulorhexis, robotic dexterity, robotic arm kinematics, porcine eyes, ophthalmic microsurgery
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Eye Foreign Bodies, Feasibility Studies, Robotics, Swine, Vitrectomy, Capsulorhexis, Surgery, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review