Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 29Glaucoma and retinal disordersscientometrics and bibliometrics researchRetinal Imaging and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss Precede Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma?

Open access
Hood, Donald C.·2019·Journal of Glaucoma

Abstract

It is often said that substantial retinal ganglion cells are lost before glaucomatous damage is detected by standard automated perimetry. There are 4 key articles referenced to support this belief. To test the hypothesis that the 4 key articles are incorrectly cited, the publications in the first 6 months of 2019 that reference 1 or more of these 4 articles were examined. In particular, the degree to which the quotes from these 2019 publications accurately reflected the evidence in the 4 key articles was assessed. These quotes are inadequately supported by the data, and in some cases even by the conclusions found in the abstracts of the key articles. This is despite several review articles that have questioned the evidence in these key articles. Further, a case can be made that the evidence in the key articles better supports the opposite conclusion. That is, the data suggest that sensitivity loss can be seen on standard automated perimetry before retinal ganglion cells are missing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ijg.0000000000001380

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Hood, D. C.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hood, Donald C.
Venue
Journal of Glaucoma
Published
2019-10-23
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
945-951
ISSN
1057-0829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985913717
Cited by
29
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Glaucoma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY002115)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
glaucoma, retinal ganglion cell death, visual field defects, standard automated perimetry, sensitivity loss, citation analysis, visual field testing
MeSH terms
Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Retinal Diseases, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Vision Disorders, Visual Fields, Visual Field Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss Precede Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ijg.0000000000001380
The paper
Hood, D. C. (2019). Does Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss Precede Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma? Journal of Glaucoma. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000001380

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.