Cited by 159Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMemory and Neural MechanismsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning to predict and control harmful events: chronic pain and conditioning

Abstract

Pain is a biologically relevant signal and response to bodily threat, associated with the urge to restore the integrity of the body. Immediate protective responses include increased arousal, selective attention, escape, and facial expressions, followed by recuperative avoidance and safety-seeking behaviors. To facilitate early and effective protection against future bodily threat or injury, learning takes place rapidly. Learning is the observable change in behavior due to events in the internal and external environmental and includes nonassociative (habituation and sensitization) and associative learning (Pavlovian and operant conditioning). Once acquired, these knowledge representations remain stored in memory and may generalize to perceptually or functionally similar events. Moreover, these processes are not just a consequence of pain; they may directly influence pain perception. In contrast to the rapid acquisition of learned responses, their extinction is slow, fragile, context dependent and only occurs through inhibitory processes. Here, we review features of associative forms of learning in humans that contribute to pain, pain-related distress, and disability and discuss promising future directions. Although conditioning has a long and honorable history, a conditioning perspective still might open new windows on novel treatment modalities that facilitate the well-being of individuals with chronic pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000107

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 119 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beckers, 2013, Whats wrong with fear conditioning Biol P, sychol, 92, 90
  2. Crombez, 1994, Klassieke conditionering en geconditioneerde pijn Classical conditioning and conditioned pain., Gedragstherapie, 27, 97

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Vlaeyen, J. W. S.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Vlaeyen, Johan W.S.
Venue
Pain
Published
2015-04
Volume
156
Issue
Supplement 1
Pages
S86-S93
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152447594
Cited by
159
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
associative learning, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, habituation, sensitization, extinction, pain perception, chronic pain, pain-related distress, pain-related disability, protective behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Psychological, Discrimination, Psychological, Extinction, Psychological, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review