Cited by 156Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a new model of attentional biases in the development, maintenance, and management of pain

Todd, Jemma, Sharpe, Louise, Johnson, Ameika, Nicholson Perry, Kathryn, Colagiuri, Ben, Dear, Blake F.·2015·Pain

Abstract

Individuals with chronic pain demonstrate attentional biases (ABs) towards pain-related stimuli. However, the clinical importance of these biases is yet to be determined and a sound theoretical model for explaining the role of ABs in the development and maintenance of pain is lacking. Within this article, we (1) systematically review prospective and experimental research exploring ABs and pain outcomes in light of current theoretical models and (2) propose a theoretical framework for understanding AB in pain. Across prospective research, an attentional pattern of vigilance-avoidance was observed. Interventions targeting ABs were less consistent; however, there were promising findings among studies that found attentional training effects, particularly for laboratory research. The proposed Threat Interpretation Model suggests a relationship between threat, interpretation, and stimuli in determining attentional processes, which while tentative generates important testable predictions regarding the role of attention in pain and builds on previous theoretical and empirical work in this area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000214

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 156

Metadata

Authors
Todd, J., Sharpe, L., Johnson, A., Nicholson Perry, K., Colagiuri, B., & Dear, B. F.
Affiliations
  • ACAP University College (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Sharpe, Louise
Venue
Pain
Published
2015-09
Volume
156
Issue
9
Pages
1589-1600
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1161601564
Cited by
156
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
attentional bias, chronic pain, pain maintenance, pain development, attention training, threat interpretation
MeSH terms
Attention, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Pain, Bias, Databases, Bibliographic, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review