Cited by 82Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Attentional biases toward sensory pain words in acute and chronic pain patients.

Open access
Haggman, Sonia P., Sharpe, Louise A., Nicholas, Michael K., Refshauge, Kathryn M.·2010·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled Attentional biases towards pain-related words of chronic and acute low back pain (LBP) patients were compared with healthy pain-free controls. Specifically, the aims were to determine: 1) whether chronic LBP patients demonstrate attentional biases compared to pain-free controls; 2) whether observed biases are also present in those with acute LBP; and 3) whether observed biases are associated with pain-related fear among the pain groups. Four groups were recruited: 1) acute LBP patients; 2) chronic LBP patients from physiotherapy practices; 3) chronic LBP patients from a tertiary referral pain-management center; and 4) healthy pain-free controls. Participants were assessed on the dot-probe computer task for attentional bias to pain-related words. All 3 pain groups demonstrated biases compared to controls on sensory but not on affective, disability, or threat words. Among the pain groups, those with low and moderate levels of fear of (re)injury demonstrated biases towards sensory pain words that were absent in those with high levels of fear, which is counterintuitive to what the fear of (re)injury model suggests. These results suggest that the experience of pain, rather than duration, is the primary indicator of the presence of pain-related biases.Perspective Attentional biases are present in chronic and acute pain. Biases towards sensory-pain stimuli were demonstrated regardless of pain duration; however, they were present in those with low and moderate levels of fear of (re)injury only and not those high in fear. These findings are not consistent with the fear of (re)injury model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.017

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haggman, S. P., Sharpe, L. A., Nicholas, M. K., & Refshauge, K. M.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Sharpe, Louise A.
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
1136-1145
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987791763
Cited by
82
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
attentional bias, pain-related words, low back pain, acute pain, chronic pain, fear of reinjury, fear-avoidance beliefs, sensory pain, affective pain, dot-probe task, pain duration
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attention, Chronic Disease, Fear, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Intractable Pain, Bias, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review