CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 403Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 274 of the 275 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations

Open access
Edwards, Robert R., Dworkin, Robert H., Turk, Dennis C., Angst, Martin S., Dionne, Raymond, Freeman, Roy, Hansson, Per, Haroutounian, Simon, Arendt-Nielsen, Lars, Attal, Nadine, Baron, Ralf, Brell, Joanna, Bujanover, Shay, Burke, Laurie B., Carr, Daniel, Chappell, Amy S., Cowan, Penney, Etropolski, Mila, Fillingim, Roger B., Gewandter, Jennifer S., Katz, Nathaniel P., Kopecky, Ernest A., Markman, John D., Nomikos, George, Porter, Linda, Rappaport, Bob A., Rice, Andrew S.C., Scavone, Joseph M., Scholz, Joachim, Simon, Lee S., Smith, Shannon M., Tobias, Jeffrey, Tockarshewsky, Tina, Veasley, Christine, Versavel, Mark, Wasan, Ajay D., Wen, Warren, Yarnitsky, David·2016·Pain
DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000602PMC PMC5965275
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is tremendous interpatient variability in the response to analgesic therapy (even for efficacious treatments), which can be the source of great frustration in clinical practice. This has led to calls for “precision medicine” or personalized pain therapeutics (ie, empirically based algorithms that determine the optimal treatments, or treatment combinations, for individual patients) that would presumably improve both the clinical care of patients with pain and the success rates for putative analgesic drugs in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. However, before implementing this approach, the characteristics of individual patients or subgroups of patients that increase or decrease the response to a specific treatment need to be identified. The challenge is to identify the measurable phenotypic characteristics of patients that are most predictive of individual variation in analgesic treatment outcomes, and the measurement tools that are best suited to evaluate these characteristics. In this article, we present evidence on the most promising of these phenotypic characteristics for use in future research, including psychosocial factors, symptom characteristics, sleep patterns, responses to noxious stimulation, endogenous pain-modulatory processes, and response to pharmacologic challenge. We provide evidence-based recommendations for core phenotyping domains and recommend measures of each domain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000602

Cites

274 of 274 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 275 references

1 of the 275 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 403

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Edwards, R. R., Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Angst, M. S., Dionne, R., Freeman, R., Hansson, P., Haroutounian, S., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Attal, N., Baron, R., Brell, J., Bujanover, S., Burke, L. B., Carr, D., Chappell, A. S., Cowan, P., Etropolski, M., Fillingim, R. B., Gewandter, J. S., Katz, N. P., Kopecky, E. A., Markman, J. D., Nomikos, G., Porter, L., Rappaport, B. A., Rice, A. S. C., Scavone, J. M., Scholz, J., Simon, L. S., Smith, S. M., Tobias, J., Tockarshewsky, T., Veasley, C., Versavel, M., Wasan, A. D., Wen, W., & Yarnitsky, D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • MetroHealth Medical Center (US)
  • Depomed (United States) (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • American Chronic Pain Association (US)
  • Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical (United States) (US)
  • Astellas Pharma (United States) (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Arlington, VA, USA
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • SDG LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Ceres (US)
  • Chronic Pain Research Alliance, North Kingstown, RI, USA
  • Zalicus, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Purdue Pharma (United States) (US)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Robert R.
ORCID
Venue
Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2016-05-05
Volume
157
Issue
9
Pages
1851-1871
ISSN
  • 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-6623
DOI
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000602
PMC
PMC5965275
OpenAlex
W2359535866
Cited by
403
References
275
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U01-FD005936)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG034982)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR064367)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
patient phenotyping, chronic pain, precision medicine, psychosocial factors, symptom characteristics, sleep patterns, endogenous pain modulation, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Pain Measurement, Phenotype, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review