Cited by 12Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Nurse-Led Body–Mind–Spirit Based Relapse Prevention Intervention for People With Diagnosis of Alcohol Use Disorder at a Mental Health Care Setting, India: A Pilot Study

Ng, Siu-man, Rentala, Sreevani, Chan, Cecilia L. W., Nayak, Raghavendra Bheemappa·2020·Journal of Addictions Nursing

Abstract

Background: Alcohol dependence is associated with alcohol-related problems and persistent vulnerability to relapse. Despite newer medications, frequent relapses continue to occur. Hence, there is a need to look at holistic approaches to deal with this problem. Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led body–mind–spirit (BMS)-based relapse prevention intervention on craving and quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption among alcohol-dependent individuals. Methods: Randomized control trial was adopted, and the study was conducted at a mental health care setting in India. Sixty individuals with alcohol use disorder were randomly assigned to a BMS group (n = 30) and a treatment-as-usual (TAU) group (n = 30) between June 2017 and March 2018. Subjects of both groups were initially assessed for craving and quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption. BMS subjects received seven sessions of BMS intervention and routine treatment at de-addiction wards. The interventions comprise of body, mind, and spirit strategies that aid in handling triggers, accept responsibility for their own well-being and take charge of self health. TAU group subjects received only routine treatment. All the participants were followed up over 3 months postdischarge. Results: Over 3 months of follow-up, BMS group subjects (vs. TAU group) reported significantly lesser quantity of alcohol consumption (F = 9.74, p < .001, η 2 = .144), fewer drinking days (F = 14.04, p < .001, η 2 = .195), lower relapse rates (14 vs. 28), and lesser craving (F = 14.01, p < .001, η 2 = .195). Regression analysis showed that number of previous attempts (>1) and increased baseline drinking were associated with relapse. Conclusion: Findings provide evidence of BMS intervention in reducing craving and drinking outcomes among alcohol-dependent individuals in India.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jan.0000000000000368

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, S.-M., Rentala, S., Chan, C. L. W., & Nayak, R. B.
Corresponding author
Rentala, Sreevani
Venue
Journal of Addictions Nursing
Published
2020-10
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
276-286
ISSN
  • 1088-4602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7148
OpenAlex
W3108113458
Cited by
12
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Addictions Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
alcoholism, relapse prevention, nurse-led intervention, alcohol craving, alcohol consumption, de-addiction, holistic medicine, precipitating factors, mental health services
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aftercare, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Hospitals, State, Humans, India, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Pilot Projects, Mind-Body Therapies, Secondary Prevention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review