Cited by 203Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Health and Mental HealthChronic Disease Management Strategies

Effect of Patient Activation on Self-Management in Patients With Heart Failure

Shively, Martha J., Gardetto, Nancy J., Kodiath, Mary F., Kelly, Ann, Smith, Tom L., Stepnowsky, Carl, Maynard, Charles, Larson, Carolyn B.·2013·Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Abstract

Background/objective Few studies have examined whether chronic heart failure (HF) outcomes can be improved by increasing patient engagement (known as activation) in care and capabilities for self-care management. The objective was to determine the efficacy of a patient activation intervention compared with usual care on activation, self-care management, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits in patients with HF. Methods This study used a randomized, 2-group, repeated-measures design. After consent was given, 84 participants were stratified by activation level and randomly assigned to usual care (n = 41) or usual care plus the intervention (n = 43). The primary outcomes and measures were patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), self-management using the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) and the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Specific Adherence Scale, and hospitalizations and emergency department visits. The intervention was a 6-month program to increase activation and improve HF self-management behaviors, such as adhering to medications and implementing health behavior goals. Results Participants were primarily male (99%), were white (77%), and had New York Heart Association III stage (52%). The mean (SD) age was 66 (11) years, and 71% reported 3 or more comorbidities. The intervention group compared with the usual care group showed a significant increase in activation/PAM scores from baseline to 6 months. No significant group-by-time inte…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcn.0b013e318239f9f9

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Taylor, 2005, . Clinical service organisation for heart failure Systematic Review., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shively, M. J., Gardetto, N. J., Kodiath, M. F., Kelly, A., Smith, T. L., Stepnowsky, C., Maynard, C., & Larson, C. B.
Affiliations
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Shively, Martha J.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Published
2013-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
20-34
ISSN
0889-4655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979263469
Cited by
203
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10
FWCI
14.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
patient activation, chronic heart failure, self-management, patient engagement, medication adherence, hospitalization, emergency department visits, Patient Activation Measure, Self-Care of Heart Failure Index, intervention efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Self Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review