Cited by 21Treatment of Major DepressionDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Antidepressant Use and Cognitive Functioning in Older Medical Patients With Major or Minor Depression: A Prospective Cohort Study With Database Linkage

Open access
Han, Ling, McCusker, Jane, Cole, Martin, Čapek, Radan, Abrahamowicz, Michal·2011·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The long-term cognitive effect of antidepressant medications in older persons is not well understood, especially in those with minor depression and complex medical conditions. The objective of this study is to examine this relationship in older medical patients with different depression diagnoses. METHODS: 281 medical inpatients aged 65 years and older from 2 acute care hospitals in Montreal, Canada, were diagnosed as with major or minor depression or without depression according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria. They were followed up with the Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for depressive symptoms at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. Antidepressant medication was ascertained from a provincial prescription database and quantified as cumulative exposures over each follow-up interval. RESULTS: During the 12-month follow-up period, 1027 antidepressant prescriptions were filled. The most frequently prescribed antidepressant agents were citalopram (0.81 prescriptions per person), sertraline (0.76), and paroxetine (0.66). Antidepressant use was not associated with cognitive changes among patients with major depression or without depression but was associated with an increased Mini-Mental State Examination score in patients with minor depression (1.4 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-2.6), independent of change in the severity of depression symptoms, concomitant benzodiazepine or psychotropic drug use, and other potentially important confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of older medical patients, antidepressant use for 12 months did not lead to significant cognitive impairment. The small cognitive improvement among minor depression associated with antidepressant use deserves further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318221b2f8

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sertraline, citalopram, or paroxetine administration were not associated with significant changes in cognitive performance in a cohort of elderly patients with major depression, whereas a beneficial effect was observed in patients with minor depression.

    “On the other hand, other findings indicated that sertraline, citalopram, or paroxetine administration, were not associated with significant changes in cognitive performance in a cohort of elderly patients with major depression, whereas a beneficial effect was observed in patients with minor depression, regardless of changes in the severity of depressive symptoms and concomitant benzodiazepine or p”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Verbeke G Molenberghs G Linear mixed models for longitudinal data 2000 New York, USA Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, L., McCusker, J., Cole, M., Čapek, R., & Abrahamowicz, M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • St Mary's Hospital Centre (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Han, Ling
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-08
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
429-435
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089679462
Cited by
21
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • McGill University
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP82494, MCT-15476)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG21342, P30AG021342)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
antidepressants, cognitive function, older adults, major depressive disorder, minor depression, cognitive impairment, citalopram, sertraline, paroxetine, medical inpatients, Mini-Mental State Examination, benzodiazepines, psychotropic drugs
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review