Cited by 147Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinically Significant Non-Major Depression: Old Concepts, New Insights

Lavretsky, Helen, Kumar, Anand·2002·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Clinically significant non-major depression has been underinvestigated despite its high prevalence and public health impact. Although there is an increasing recognition of the importance of non-major forms of depression, their nosological boundaries and neurobiological mechanisms remain largely unknown. The authors discuss the literature pertaining to the current concepts, phenomenology, neurobiology, and treatment approaches to geriatric non-major clinically significant depression. They examine the similarities and differences between various subtypes of depressive disorders and compare non-major, clinically significant depression in elderly patients with non-geriatric adult populations. They draw conclusions from the published literature and propose clinical criteria for the diagnosis of clinically significant non-major depression in elderly persons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00019442-200205000-00003

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 129 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Koscis, 1998, Geriatric dysthymia, J Clin Psychiatry, 59, 13
  2. Remick, 1996, Major depression, minor depression, and double depression: are they distinct clinical entities?, Am J Med Genet, 67, 347, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960726)67:4<347::AID-AJMG6>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beekman, 1997, Consequences of major and minor depression in later life: a study of disability, well-being, and service utilization, Psychol Med, 27, 1397, 10.1017/S0033291797005734 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Metadata

Authors
Lavretsky, H., & Kumar, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Lavretsky, Helen
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
239-255
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970129540
Cited by
147
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K02MH002043, R01MH061567, K23 MH 01948, KO2-MH02043, MH-55115, K23MH001948, R01MH055115, MH61567)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
geriatric depression, elderly patients, depression subtypes, neurobiology of depression, phenomenology of depression, depression treatment, diagnostic criteria, disease classification
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review